RESEARCH PAPER

German tobacco industry’s successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke

A Bornhäuser¹, J McCarthy², S A Glantz²

¹ Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
² Center for Tobacco Control Research & Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Stanton A Glantz
PhD, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390, USA; glantz{at}medicine.ucsf.edu

Objective: To examine the tactics the tobacco industry in Germany used to avoid regulation of secondhand smoke exposure and to maintain the acceptance of public smoking.

Methods: Systematic search of tobacco industry documents available on the internet between June 2003 and August 2004.

Results: In West Germany, policymakers were, as early as the mid 1970s, well aware of the fact that secondhand smoke endangers non-smokers. One might have assumed that Germany, an international leader in environmental protection, would have led in protecting her citizens against secondhand smoke pollution. The tobacco manufacturers in Germany, however, represented by the national manufacturing organisation "Verband" (Verband der Cigarettenindustrie), contained and neutralised the early debate about the danger of secondhand smoke. This success was achieved by carefully planned collaboration with selected scientists, health professionals and policymakers, along with a sophisticated public relations programme.

Conclusions: The strategies of the tobacco industry have been largely successful in inhibiting the regulation of secondhand smoke in Germany. Policymakers, health professionals, the media and the general public should be aware of this industry involvement and should take appropriate steps to close the gap between what is known and what is done about the health effects of secondhand smoke.

Keywords: tobacco smoke pollution; environmental tobacco smoke; politics; Verband

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lum, K L, Barnes, R L, Glantz, S A (2009). Enacting tobacco taxes by direct popular vote in the United States: lessons from 20 years of experience. Tobacco Control 18: 377-386 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cohen, J E, Zeller, M, Eissenberg, T, Parascandola, M, O'Keefe, R, Planinac, L, Leischow, S (2009). Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry. Tobacco Control 18: 228-234 [Full Text]  
• Schneider, N. K, Glantz, S. A (2008). "Nicotine Nazis strike again": a brief analysis of the use of Nazi rhetoric in attacking tobacco control advocacy. Tobacco Control 17: 291-296 [Full Text]  
• Mamudu, H. M., Hammond, R., Glantz, S. A. (2008). Project Cerberus: Tobacco Industry Strategy to Create an Alternative to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. AJPH 98: 1630-1642 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tong, E. K., Glantz, S. A. (2007). Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 116: 1845-1854 [Abstract] [Full Text]