Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2006;15:152-159; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.011551
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Web-only appendices
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornuz, J
Right arrow Articles by Paccaud, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cornuz, J
Right arrow Articles by Paccaud, F

RESEARCH PAPER

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapies for nicotine dependence in primary care settings: a multinational comparison

J Cornuz1,2, A Gilbert1,2,3, C Pinget3, P McDonald5, K Slama6, E Salto7, F Paccaud1

1 Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
2 Department of ambulatory care, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
3 Institut d’économie et de management de la santé, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
4 Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
5 Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
6 Tobacco Prevention Division, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
7 Primary Prevention of Chronic Diseases Unit, Public Health Division, Department of Health & Social Security, Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence to:
Dr Jacques Cornuz
Department of Ambulatory and Community Medicine, University Hospital, CH–1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; jacques.cornuz{at}chuv.hospvd.ch

Objective: To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the first-line pharmacotherapies (nicotine gum, patch, spray, inhaler, and bupropion) for smoking cessation across six Western countries—Canada, France, Spain, Switzerland, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

Design and study population: A Markov-chain cohort model to simulate two cohorts of smokers: (1) a reference cohort given brief cessation counselling by a general practitioner (GP); (2) a treatment cohort given counselling plus pharmacotherapy. Effectiveness expressed as odds ratios for quitting associated with pharmacotherapies. Costs based on the additional physician time required and retail prices of the medications.

Interventions: Addition of each first-line pharmacotherapy to GP cessation counselling.

Main outcome measures: Cost per life-year saved associated with pharmacotherapies.

Results: The cost per life-year saved for counselling only ranged from US$190 in Spain to $773 in the UK for men, and from $288 in Spain to $1168 in the UK for women. The incremental cost per life-year saved for gum ranged from $2230 for men in Spain to $7643 for women in the US; for patch from $1758 for men in Spain to $5131 for women in the UK; for spray from $1935 for men in Spain to $7969 for women in the US; for inhaler from $3480 for men in Switzerland to $8700 for women in France; and for bupropion from $792 for men in Canada to $2922 for women in the US. In sensitivity analysis, changes in discount rate, treatment effectiveness, and natural quit rate had the strongest influences on cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of the pharmacotherapies varied significantly across the six study countries, however, in each case, the results would be considered favourable as compared to other common preventive pharmacotherapies.


Keywords: smoking cessation; nicotine replacement therapy; cost-effectiveness analysis; Markov model; countries




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
L. Gordon, N. Graves, A. Hawkes, and E. Eakin
A review of the cost-effectiveness of face-to-face behavioural interventions for smoking, physical activity, diet and alcohol
Chronic Illness, June 1, 2007; 3(2): 101 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. Tonnesen, L. Carrozzi, K. O. Fagerstrom, C. Gratziou, C. Jimenez-Ruiz, S. Nardini, G. Viegi, C. Lazzaro, I. A. Campell, E. Dagli, et al.
Smoking cessation in patients with respiratory diseases: a high priority, integral component of therapy
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2007; 29(2): 390 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.