Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2006;15:215-223; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.014977
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH PAPER

Philip Morris’s Project Sunrise: weakening tobacco control by working with it

P A McDaniel1, E A Smith2 and R E Malone2

1 Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, USA
2 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Ruth E Malone
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 455, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA; ruth.malone{at}ucsf.edu

Objective: To analyse the implications of Philip Morris USA’s (PM’s) overtures toward tobacco control and other public health organisations, 1995–2006.

Data sources: Internal PM documents made available through multi-state US attorneys general lawsuits and other cases, and newspaper sources.

Methods: Documents were retrieved from several industry documents websites and analysed using a case study approach.

Results: PM’s Project Sunrise, initiated in 1995 and proposed to continue through 2006, was a long-term plan to address tobacco industry delegitimisation and ensure the social acceptability of smoking and of the company itself. Project Sunrise laid out an explicit divide-and-conquer strategy against the tobacco control movement, proposing the establishment of relationships with PM-identified "moderate" tobacco control individuals and organisations and the marginalisation of others. PM planned to use "carefully orchestrated efforts" to exploit existing differences of opinion within tobacco control, weakening its opponents by working with them. PM also planned to thwart tobacco industry delegitimisation by repositioning itself as "responsible". We present evidence that these plans were implemented.

Conclusion: Sunrise exposes differences within the tobacco control movement that should be further discussed. The goal should not be consensus, but a better understanding of tensions within the movement. As the successes of the last 25 years embolden advocates to think beyond passage of the next clean indoor air policy or funding of the next cessation programme, movement philosophical differences may become more important. If tobacco control advocates are not ready to address them, Project Sunrise suggests that Philip Morris is ready to exploit them.

Abbreviations: ASSIST, American Stop Smoking Intervention Study; CALA, Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse; CTFK, Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; MBD, Mongoven, Biscoe, and Duchin; PM, Philip Morris USA

Keywords: tobacco industry documents; corporate social responsibility; Philip Morris; tobacco control movement; delegitimisation; advocacy; tobacco control policy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Apollonio, D. E., Malone, R. E. (2009). Turning negative into positive: public health mass media campaigns and negative advertising. Health Educ Res 24: 483-495 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hastings, G., Liberman, J. (2009). Tobacco corporate social responsibility and fairy godmothers: the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control slays a modern myth. Tobacco Control 18: 73-74 [Full Text]  
  • Gilmore, A. B., Britton, J., Arnott, D., Ashcroft, R., Jarvis, M. J. (2009). The place for harm reduction and product regulation in UK tobacco control policy. J Public Health (Oxf) 31: 3-10 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McDaniel, P. A., Malone, R. E. (2009). The Role of Corporate Credibility in Legitimizing Disease Promotion. Am. J. Public Health 99: 452-461 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tesler, L. E., Malone, R. E. (2008). Corporate Philanthropy, Lobbying, and Public Health Policy. Am. J. Public Health 98: 2123-2133 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yang, J S, Malone, R E (2008). "Working to shape what society's expectations of us should be": Philip Morris' societal alignment strategy. Tobacco Control 17: 391-398 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Derry, R., Waikar, S. V. (2008). Frames and Filters: Strategic Distrust as a Legitimation Tool in the 50-Year Battle Between Public Health Activists and Big Tobacco. Business Society 47: 102-139 [Abstract]  
  • McDaniel, P. A, Malone, R. E (2007). "I always thought they were all pure tobacco": American smokers' perceptions of "natural" cigarettes and tobacco industry advertising strategies. Tobacco Control 16: e7-e7 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Malone, R. E (2007). Working to make a disease. Tobacco Control 16: 361-362 [Full Text]  
  • Szczypka, G., Wakefield, M. A, Emery, S., Terry-McElrath, Y. M, Flay, B. R, Chaloupka, F. J (2007). Working to make an image: an analysis of three Philip Morris corporate image media campaigns. Tobacco Control 16: 344-350 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Givel, M. (2007). FDA legislation. Tobacco Control 16: 217-218 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.