RESEARCH PAPER

The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity

L Joossens¹, M Raw²

¹ Tobacco Control Manager, Belgian Foundation Against Cancer; Advocacy Officer, Association of the European Cancer Leagues, Brussels, Belgium
² Freelance consultant; honorary senior lecturer in public health science, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ Medical School, University of London, UK; visiting professor, Sao Paulo Medical School, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Luk Joossens
Belgian Foundation Against Cancer; Association of the European Cancer Leagues, 479 Chaussee de Louvain, Brussels B-1030, Belgium; joossens{at}globalink.org

Objectives: To quantify the implementation of tobacco control policies at country level using a new Tobacco Control Scale and to report initial results using the scale.

Method: A questionnaire sent to correspondents in 30 European countries, using a scoring system designed with the help of a panel of international tobacco control experts.

Results: The 30 countries are ranked by their total score on the scale out of a maximum possible score of 100. Only four countries (Ireland, United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland) scored 70 or more, with an eight point gap (most differences in scores are small) to the fifth country, Malta, on 62. Only 13 countries scored above 50, 11 of them from the European Union (EU), and the second largest points gap occurs between Denmark on 45 and Portugal on 39, splitting the table into three groups: 70 and above, 45 to 62, 39 and below. Ireland had the highest overall score, 74 out of 100, and Luxembourg was bottom with 26 points. However even Ireland, much praised for their ban on smoking in public places, did not increase tobacco taxes in 2005, for the first time since 1995.

Conclusions: Although the Tobacco Control Scale has limitations, this is the first time such a scale has been developed and applied to so many countries. We hope it will be useful in encouraging countries to strengthen currently weak areas of their tobacco control policy.

Abbreviations: CDC, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ENSP, European Network for Smoking Prevention; FCTC, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control; GDP, gross domestic product; PPS, purchasing power standards; TCS, Tobacco Control Scale

Keywords: tobacco Control Scale; measurement; tobacco control policy

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Scheffels, J. (2009). Stigma, or sort of cool: Young adults' accounts of smoking and identity. European Journal of Cultural Studies 12: 469-486 [Abstract]  
• Chow, C. K., Lock, K., Teo, K., Subramanian, S., McKee, M., Yusuf, S. (2009). Environmental and societal influences acting on cardiovascular risk factors and disease at a population level: a review. Int J Epidemiol 0: dyn258v1-dyn258 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Patja, K., Hakala, S. M., Bostrom, G., Nordgren, P., Haglund, M. (2009). Trends of tobacco use in Sweden and Finland: Do differences in tobacco policy relate to tobacco use?. Scand J Public Health 37: 153-160 [Abstract]  
• Bartsch, P. (2008). Implications and priorities of tobacco control in Belgium and Europe. ERR 17: 205-208 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Thyrian, J R, Bandelin, A, John, U (2008). Smoking policies in hospitals before the non-smoker protection law in Germany. Tobacco Control 17: 431-432 [Full Text]  
• West, R., Townsend, J., Joossens, L., Arnott, D., Lewis, S. (2008). Why combating tobacco smuggling is a priority. BMJ 337: a1933-a1933 [Full Text]  
• Moodie, C., MacKintosh, A. M., Brown, A., Hastings, G. B. (2008). Tobacco marketing awareness on youth smoking susceptibility and perceived prevalence before and after an advertising ban. Eur J Public Health 18: 484-490 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schaap, M M, Kunst, A E, Leinsalu, M, Regidor, E, Ekholm, O, Dzurova, D, Helmert, U, Klumbiene, J, Santana, P, Mackenbach, J P (2008). Effect of nationwide tobacco control policies on smoking cessation in high and low educated groups in 18 European countries. Tobacco Control 17: 248-255 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Scheffels, J (2008). A difference that makes a difference: young adult smokers' accounts of cigarette brands and package design. Tobacco Control 17: 118-122 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chapman, S, Freeman, B (2008). Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry. Tobacco Control 17: 25-31 [Abstract] [Full Text]