HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Web-only appendix Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hirschhorn, N Articles by Shatenstein, S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hirschhorn, N Articles by Shatenstein, S Related Collections Advertising and Marketing

The Philip Morris External Research Program: results from the first round of projects

¹ London, UK
² Tobacco Policy International, San Francisco, California, USA
³ GLOBALink News & Information, Montreal, Canada

Correspondence to:
Norbert Hirschhorn
115 Greencroft Gardens, London NW6 3PE, UK; bertzpoet{at}yahoo.com

ABSTRACT
Background: Philip Morris (PM) launched the Philip Morris External Research Program (PMERP) in 2000, two years after the company agreed to the dissolution of two industry-wide, external research programmes: the Council for Tobacco Research (CTR) and the Center for Indoor Air Research (CIAR). Our previous analysis of PMERP’s Request for Applications noted that PMERP’s structure, while ostensibly concerned with new product development, was remarkably similar to that of CIAR. We also found the majority of designated peer-reviewers had previous ties to the tobacco industry and the research solicitation seemed to invite mitigating evidence concerning cigarettes and constituent risks. We concluded that a prime reason for PMERP’s existence was to garner scientific credibility for PM.

Objective: To examine the grants awarded in the first round of PMERP and subsequent peer-reviewed publications.

Methods: Searches of industry documents available on the internet using PMERP and its variations as initial keywords; searches on Medline for publications from PMERP grantees.

Results: Of 153 applications, 61 proposals were funded, 36 of which generated 78 scientific publications. Of these, 65% deal specifically with the tobacco plant or constituents. Over half the researchers listed as PMERP participants had previously received or applied for tobacco funding. One internal document indicated PMERP’s objectives included gaining "credibility" and "goodwill", and finding "young scientists". In addition, PM has launched its own and more extensive internal product design research programme.

Conclusion: PMERP appears to exist less as a conduit for critical scientific inquiry than to fit into a corporate strategy intended to burnish PM’s public image.

Abbreviations: CIAR, Center for Indoor Air Research; CTR, Council for Tobacco Research; INBIFO, Institut für Biologische Forschung; PI, principal investigator; PM, Philip Morris; PMERP, Philip Morris External Research Program; RFA, Request for Applications; SAB, Science Advisory Board

Keywords: Philip Morris; external research; Philip Morris External Research Program; Center for Indoor Air Research

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. K. Tong and S. A. Glantz Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): 1845 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. F Schick and S. A Glantz Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement Tob. Control, June 1, 2007; 16(3): 157 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]