RESEARCH PAPER

Increased reach and effectiveness of a statewide tobacco quitline after the addition of access to free nicotine replacement therapy

Lawrence C An¹, Barbara A Schillo², Annette M Kavanaugh³, Randi B Lachter², Michael G Luxenberg³, Ann H Wendling² and Anne M Joseph⁴

¹ University of Minnesota, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
² Minnesota Partnership for Action Against Tobacco, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
³ Professional Data Analysts, Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
⁴ Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Lawrence C An
MD, University of Minnesota, Mayo Building, Mail Code 741, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; lcan{at}umn.edu

Background: Tobacco users receiving behavioural and pharmacological assistance are more likely to quit. Although telephone quitlines provide population access to counselling, few offer pharmacotherapy.

Objective: To assess change in cessation rates and programme impact after the addition of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to statewide quitline services.

Design, setting, participants: An observational study of cohorts of callers to the Minnesota QUITPLAN^SM Helpline before (n = 380) and after (n = 373) the addition of access to free NRT.

Intervention: Mailing of NRT (patch or gum) to callers enrolling in multi-session counselling.

Main outcome measure: Thirty-day abstinence six months after programme registration.

Results: The number of callers increased from 155 (SD 75) to 679 (180) per month pre-NRT to post-NRT (difference 524, 95% confidence interval (CI) 323 to 725). Post-NRT, the proportion of callers enrolling in multi-session counselling (23.4% v 90.1%, difference 66.6%, 95% CI 60.8% to 71.6%) and using pharmacotherapy (46.8% v 86.8%, difference 40.0%, 95% CI 31.3% to 47.9%) increased. Thirty-day abstinence at six months increased from 10.0% pre-NRT to 18.2% post-NRT (difference 8.2%, 95% CI 3.1% to 13.4%). Post-NRT the average number of new ex-smokers per month among registrants increased from 15.5 to 123.6 (difference 108.1, 95% CI 61.1 to 155.0). The cost per quit pre-NRT was $1362 (SD $207). The cost per quit post-NRT was $1934 ($215) suggesting a possible increase in cost per quit (difference $572, 95% CI –$12 to $1157).

Conclusion: The addition of free NRT to a state quitline is followed by increases in participation and abstinence rates resulting in an eightfold increase in programme impact. These findings support the addition of access to pharmacological therapy as part of state quitline services.

Keywords: tobacco control; smoking cessation; telephone counselling; nicotine replacement therapy; state programs

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Tworek, C., Haskins, A., Woods, S. (2009). Maine's Tobacco Medication Program: Compliance, patterns of use, and satisfaction among smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 904-907 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Murray, R. L., Bauld, L., Hackshaw, L. E., McNeill, A. (2009). Improving access to smoking cessation services for disadvantaged groups: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf) 31: 258-277 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ossip, D. J., Abrams, S. M., Mahoney, M. C., Sall, D., Cummings, K. M. (2009). Adverse effects with use of nicotine replacement therapy among quitline clients. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 408-417 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miller, C L, Sedivy, V (2009). Using a quitline plus low-cost nicotine replacement therapy to help disadvantaged smokers to quit. Tobacco Control 18: 144-149 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stead, L. F, Perera, R., Lancaster, T. (2007). A systematic review of interventions for smokers who contact quitlines. Tobacco Control 16: i3-i8 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cummins, S. E, Bailey, L., Campbell, S., Koon-Kirby, C., Zhu, S.-H. (2007). Tobacco cessation quitlines in North America: a descriptive study. Tobacco Control 16: i9-i15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Farrelly, M. C, Hussin, A., Bauer, U. E (2007). Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of television, radio and print advertisements in promoting the New York smokers' quitline. Tobacco Control 16: i21-i23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Swartz Woods, S., Haskins, A. E (2007). Increasing reach of quitline services in a US state with comprehensive tobacco treatment. Tobacco Control 16: i33-i36 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schillo, B. A, Wendling, A., Saul, J., Luxenberg, M. G, Lachter, R., Christenson, M., An, L. C (2007). Expanding access to nicotine replacement therapy through Minnesota's QUITLINE partnership. Tobacco Control 16: i37-i41 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tinkelman, D., Wilson, S. M, Willett, J., Sweeney, C. T (2007). Offering free NRT through a tobacco quitline: impact on utilisation and quit rates. Tobacco Control 16: i42-i46 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fellows, J. L, Bush, T., McAfee, T., Dickerson, J. (2007). Cost effectiveness of the Oregon quitline "free patch initiative". Tobacco Control 16: i47-i52 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Maher, J. E, Rohde, K., Dent, C. W, Stark, M. J, Pizacani, B., Boysun, M. J, Dilley, J. A, Yepassis-Zembrou, P. L (2007). Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations?. Tobacco Control 16: i65-i70 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Anderson, C M, Zhu, S-H (2007). Tobacco quitlines: looking back and looking ahead. Tobacco Control 16: i81-i86 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lee, D. J, Fleming, L. E, McCollister, K. E, Caban, A. J, Arheart, K. L, LeBlanc, W. G, Chung-Bridges, K., Christ, S. L, Dietz, N., Clark, J. D III (2007). Healthcare provider smoking cessation advice among US worker groups. Tobacco Control 16: 325-328 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Maher, J. E, Rohde, K., Pizacani, B., Dent, C., Stark, M. J, Dilley, J. A, Pickle, K. E, Boysun, M. J, Thompson, J. R, Yepassis-Zembrou, P. (2007). Does free nicotine replacement therapy for young adults prompt them to call a quitline?. Tobacco Control 16: 357-358 [Full Text]