RESEARCH PAPER

Smoke-free laws and secondhand smoke exposure in US non-smoking adults, 1999–2002

Melanie S Pickett^1,*, Susan E Schober², Debra J Brody², Lester R Curtin² and Gary A Giovino³

¹ Brookline, Massachusetts, USA
² Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA
³ Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Debra J Brody
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 4215, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA; sschober{at}cdc.gov

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between smoke-free law coverage and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in the United States non-smoking adult population.

Design: We used data from the 1999–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the US population. Serum cotinine levels were available for 5866 non-smoking adults from 57 survey locations. Each location was categorised into one of three groups indicating extensive, limited, and no coverage by a smoke-free law.

Main outcome measures: The proportion of adults with SHS exposure, defined as having serum cotinine levels 0.05 ng/ml.

Results: Among non-smoking adults living in counties with extensive smoke-free law coverage, 12.5% were exposed to SHS, compared with 35.1% with limited coverage, and 45.9% with no law. Adjusting for confounders, men and women residing in counties with extensive coverage had 0.10 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.16) and 0.19 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.34) times the odds of SHS exposure compared to those residing in counties without a smoke-free law.

Conclusions: These results support the scientific evidence suggesting that smoke-free laws are an effective strategy for reducing SHS exposure.

Abbreviations: ANRF, American Nonsmoker’s Rights Foundation; LOD, limit of detection; MEC, mobile examination centre; MVU, masked variance unit; NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; SHS, secondhand smoke; PSU, primary sampling unit

Keywords: secondhand smoke; cotinine; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ellis, J. A., Gwynn, C., Garg, R. K., Philburn, R., Aldous, K. M., Perl, S. B., Thorpe, L., Frieden, T. R. (2009). Secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmokers nationally and in New York City. Nicotine Tob Res 0: ntp021v1-ntp021 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Peppone, L J, Piazza, K M, Mahoney, M C, Morrow, G R, Mustian, K M, Palesh, O G, Hyland, A (2009). Associations between adult and childhood secondhand smoke exposures and fecundity and fetal loss among women who visited a cancer hospital. Tobacco Control 18: 115-120 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2008). Disparities in Secondhand Smoke Exposure--United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004. JAMA 300: 1019-1020 [Full Text]  
• Eriksen, M., Chaloupka, F. (2007). The Economic Impact of Clean Indoor Air Laws. CA Cancer J Clin 57: 367-378 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2007). Reduced Secondhand Smoke Exposure After Implementation of a Comprehensive Statewide Smoking Ban New York, June 26, 2003 June 30, 2004. JAMA 298: 1392-1394 [Full Text]  
• Akhtar, P. C, Currie, D. B, Currie, C. E, Haw, S. J (2007). Changes in child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (CHETS) study after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey. BMJ 335: 545-545 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haw, S. J, Gruer, L. (2007). Changes in exposure of adult non-smokers to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey. BMJ 335: 549-549 [Abstract] [Full Text]