Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2006;15:409-411; doi:10.1136/tc.2006.015974
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Environmental tobacco smoke

BRIEF REPORT

Observed smoking in cars: a method and differences by socioeconomic area

Josh Martin, Robert George, Kirsty Andrews, Peter Barr, Derryn Bicknell, Elizabeth Insull, Carl Knox, Jessie Liu, Mumraiz Naqshband, Kate Romeril, Donny Wong, George Thomson, Nick Wilson

Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Otago University, Wellington South, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Dr Nick Wilson
Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Otago University, PO Box 7342, Wellington South, New Zealand; nwilson{at}actrix.gen.nz


ABSTRACT
Objectives: To establish a reproducible method to estimate he point prevalence of smoking and second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure in cars, and to compare this prevalence between two areas of contrasting socioeconomic status.

Method: A method involving two teams of observers was developed and evaluated. It involved observing 16 055 cars in Wellington, New Zealand. Two of the observation sites represented a high and a low area of deprivation (based on a neighbourhood deprivation index) and three were in the central city.

Results: A 4.1% point prevalence of smoking in cars was observed (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8% to 4.4%). There was a higher prevalence of smoking in cars in the high deprivation area relative to the other sites, and particularly compared to the low deprivation area (rate ratio relative to the latter 3.2, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.0). Of cars with smoking, 23.7% had other occupants being exposed to SHS. Cars with smoking and other occupants were significantly more likely to have a window open (especially if the smoker was not the driver). The observation method developed was practical, and inter-observer agreement was high ({kappa} value for the "smoking seen in car" category 0.95).

Conclusions: Observational studies can be an effective way of investigating smoking in cars. The data from this survey suggest that smoking in cars occurs at a higher rate in relatively deprived populations and hence may contribute to health inequalities. Fortunately, there are a number of policy options for reducing SHS exposure in cars including mass media campaigns and laws for smoke-free cars.


Keywords: tobacco smoking; second-hand smoke; cars; motor vehicles; observational study







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.