HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dozier, A M Articles by Armstrong, L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dozier, A M Articles by Armstrong, L Related Collections Smoking Tobacco use

Tobacco use in the Dominican Republic: understanding the culture first

¹ Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
² University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
³ Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra, Dominican Republic

Correspondence to:
Ann M Dozier
RN, PhD, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, 601 Elmwood Avenue – Box 324, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA; ann_dozier{at}urmc.rochester.edu

Objective: To conduct formative research on the landscape of tobacco use to guide survey and subsequent intervention development in the Dominican Republic (DR).

Design: Rapid Assessment Procedures, systematic qualitative methods (participant-observations, in-depth interviewing, focus groups) using bilingual mixed age and gendered teams from the United States and DR.

Subjects: Over 160 adults (men and women), ages 18 to 90 years, current, former and never smokers, community members and leaders from six underserved, economically disadvantaged DR communities.

Main outcome measures: Key domains: tobacco use patterns and attitudes; factors affecting smoking initiation, continuation, quitting; perceived risks/benefits/effects of smoking; and awareness/effects of advertising/regulations.

Results: Perceptions of prevalence varied widely. While "everybody" smokes, smokers or ex-smokers were sometimes difficult to find. Knowledge of health risks was limited to the newly mandated statement "Fumar es prejudicial para la salud" [Smoking is harmful to your health]. Smokers started due to parents, peers, learned lifestyle, fashion or as something to do. Smoking served as an escape, relaxation or diversion. Quit attempts relied on personal will, primarily for religious or medical reasons. Social smoking (custom or habit) (< 10 cigarettes per day) was viewed as a lifestyle choice rather than a vice or addiction. Out of respect, smokers selected where they smoked and around whom. Health care providers typically were reactive relative to tobacco cessation, focusing on individuals with smoking related conditions. Tobacco advertising was virtually ubiquitous. Anti-tobacco messages were effectively absent. Cultures of smoking and not smoking coexisted absent a culture of quitting.

Conclusions: Systematic qualitative methods provided pertinent information about tobacco attitudes and use to guide subsequent project steps. Integrating qualitative then quantitative research can be replicated in similar countries that lack empirical data on the cultural dimensions of tobacco use.

Abbreviations: CTC, Community Technology Centers; DM, Dominican Republic; FCTC, Framework Convention for Tobacco Control; LAC, Latin American and Caribbean; LINCOS, Little Intelligent Communities; RAP, rapid assessment procedure; UR, University of Rochester

Keywords: Dominic Republic; tobacco; global; qualitative methods