Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2006;15(Supplement 3 ):iii19-iii25; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.012294
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, D
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, D
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K M
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Health effects of tobacco use

RESEARCH PAPER

Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

D Hammond1, G T Fong2, A McNeill3, R Borland4, K M Cummings5

1 Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo
3 Division of Public Health & Epidemiology, University College London, London, UK
4 The Cancer Council, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
5 Department of Health Behavior Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr David Hammond
Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada; dhammond{at}uwaterloo.ca

Background: Health warnings on cigarette packages are among the most common means of communicating the health risks of smoking. However, few studies have evaluated the impact of package warnings on consumer knowledge about tobacco risks.

Objective: The aim of the current study was to use nationally representative samples of adult smokers from the United States (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada (CAN), and Australia (AUS) from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey (ITC-4) to examine variations in smokers’ knowledge about tobacco risks and the impact of package warnings.

Methods: A telephone survey was conducted with 9058 adult smokers from the following countries: USA (n = 2138), UK (n = 2401), CAN (n = 2214) and AUS (n = 2305). Respondents were asked to state whether they believed smoking caused heart disease, stroke, impotence, lung cancer in smokers, and lung cancer in non-smokers. Respondents were also asked whether the following chemicals are found in cigarette smoke: cyanide, arsenic and carbon monoxide.

Findings: Smokers in the four countries exhibited significant gaps in their knowledge of the risks of smoking. Smokers who noticed the warnings were significantly more likely to endorse health risks, including lung cancer and heart disease. In each instance where labelling policies differed between countries, smokers living in countries with government mandated warnings reported greater health knowledge. For example, in Canada, where package warnings include information about the risks of impotence, smokers were 2.68 (2.41–2.97) times more likely to agree that smoking causes impotence compared to smokers from the other three countries.

Conclusion: Smokers are not fully informed about the risks of smoking. Warnings that are graphic, larger, and more comprehensive in content are more effective in communicating the health risks of smoking.


Abbreviations: CATI, computer assisted telephone interviewing; FCTC, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control; ITC-4, International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey

Keywords: warning labels; health knowledge; smoking behaviour; tobacco constituents; tobacco control policy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
R. J. O'Connor, L. T. Kozlowski, R. Borland, D. Hammond, and A. McNeill
Relationship between constituent labelling and reporting of tar yields among smokers in four countries
J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2006; 28(4): 324 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
G T Fong, K M Cummings, D R Shopland, and for the ITC Collaboration
Building the evidence base for effective tobacco control policies: the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (the ITC Project)
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(suppl_3): iii1 - iii2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
G T Fong, K M Cummings, R Borland, G Hastings, A Hyland, G A Giovino, D Hammond, and M E Thompson
The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(suppl_3): iii3 - iii11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M Siahpush, A McNeill, D Hammond, and G T Fong
Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: results from the 2002 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(suppl_3): iii65 - iii70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.