HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Proctor, R. N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Proctor, R. N

"Everyone knew but no one had proof": tobacco industry use of medical history expertise in US courts, 1990–2002

Correspondence to:
Professor Robert N Proctor
History Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; rproctor{at}stanford.edu

ABSTRACT
Historians have played an important role in recent tobacco litigation, helping the industry with its defence of "common knowledge" and "open controversy". Historians re-narrate the past, creating an account for judges and juries that makes it appear that "everyone has always known" that cigarettes are harmful, meaning that smokers have only themselves to blame for their illnesses. Medical historians are also employed to argue that "honest doubts" persisted in the medical community long past the 1950s, justifying as responsible the industry’s longstanding claim of "no proof" of hazards. The industry’s experts emphasise the "good science" supported by the industry, and ignore the industry’s role in spreading doubts about the reality of tobacco hazards.

Abbreviations: TRIC, Tobacco Industry Research Council

Keywords: open controversy; medical history; expert witnesses; tobacco litigation; agnotology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Stevenson and R. N. Proctor The SECRET and SOUL of Marlboro: Phillip Morris and the Origins, Spread, and Denial of Nicotine Freebasing Am J Public Health, July 1, 2008; 98(7): 1184 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E Henningfield, C. A Rose, and M. Zeller Tobacco industry litigation position on addiction: continued dependence on past views Tob. Control, December 1, 2006; 15(suppl_4): iv27 - iv36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]