Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2006;15(Supplement 4 ):iv4-iv8; doi:10.1136/tc.2006.016667
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

SPECIAL COMMUNICATION

The Tobacco Deposition and Trial Testimony Archive (DATTA) project: origins, aims, and methods

Ronald M Davis1, Clifford E Douglas2 and John K Beasley3

1 Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
2 Tobacco Control Law and Policy Consulting, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
3 Center for Tobacco Use Prevention and Research, Michigan Public Health Institute, Okemos, Michigan, USA; jbeasley{at}mphi.org

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Ronald M Davis
MD, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Henry Ford Health System, One Ford Place, 5C, Detroit, MI 48202-3450, USA; ron.davis{at}ama-assn.org

Research on previously secret tobacco industry documents has grown substantially during the past decade, since these documents first became available as the result of private and governmental litigation and investigations by the US Congress and the US Food and Drug Administration. Complementary research on tobacco litigation testimony is now being conducted through the Tobacco Deposition and Trial Testimony Archive (DATTA) project. We obtained transcripts of depositions and trial testimony, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, and other litigation documents from law firms, court reporter firms, individual lawyers and witnesses, tobacco company websites, and other sources. As of 3 March 2006, the publicly available collection of DATTA (http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta) contained 4850 transcripts of depositions and trial testimony, including a total of about 820 000 transcript pages. Transcripts covered testimony from 1957 to 2005 (85% were for testimony from 1990 to 2005) given by more than 1500 witnesses in a total of 232 lawsuits. Twelve research teams were established to study the transcripts, with each team covering a particular topic (for example, the health consequences of tobacco use, addiction and pharmacology, tobacco advertising and promotion, tobacco-product design and manufacture, economic impact of tobacco use, youth initiation of tobacco use, and public understanding of the risks of tobacco use and exposure to second-hand smoke). The teams used qualitative research methods to analyse the documents, and their initial findings are published throughout this journal supplement.

Abbreviations: ANRF, Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation; DATTA, Tobacco Deposition and Trial Testimony Archive; MPHI, Michigan Public Health Institute; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement; NCI, National Cancer Institute; OCR, optical character recognition; OSHA, US Occupational Safety and Health Administration; PDF, portable document format; PNG, portable network graphic; TIFF, tagged image file format; TDO, Tobacco Documents Online; UCSF, University of California, San Francisco

Keywords: tobacco; smoking; tobacco industry; legal cases; jurisprudence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Davis, R M (2008). British American Tobacco ghost-wrote reports on tobacco advertising bans by the International Advertising Association and J J Boddewyn. Tobacco Control 17: 211-214 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Blanke, D D., Humphrey, H. H III (2006). Putting truth into action: using the evidence for justice. Tobacco Control 15: iv1-iv3 [Full Text]  
  • Milberger, S., Davis, R. M, Douglas, C. E, Beasley, J. K, Burns, D., Houston, T., Shopland, D. (2006). Tobacco manufacturers' defence against plaintiffs' claims of cancer causation: throwing mud at the wall and hoping some of it will stick. Tobacco Control 15: iv17-iv26 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Henningfield, J. E, Rose, C. A, Zeller, M. (2006). Tobacco industry litigation position on addiction: continued dependence on past views. Tobacco Control 15: iv27-iv36 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Balbach, E. D, Smith, E. A, Malone, R. E (2006). How the health belief model helps the tobacco industry: individuals, choice, and "information". Tobacco Control 15: iv37-iv43 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goldberg, M. E, Davis, R. M, O'Keefe, A. M. (2006). The role of tobacco advertising and promotion: themes employed in litigation by tobacco industry witnesses. Tobacco Control 15: iv54-iv67 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Francis, J. A, Shea, A. K, Samet, J. M (2006). Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses. Tobacco Control 15: iv68-iv76 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Max, W., Tsoukalas, T. (2006). Economics on trial: the use and abuse of economic methods in third party tobacco litigation. Tobacco Control 15: iv77-iv83 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wayne, G. F. (2006). Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) in industry trial testimony. Tobacco Control 15: iv90-iv97 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.