RESEARCH PAPER

Effect of smoking regulations in local restaurants on smokers’ anti-smoking attitudes and quitting behaviours

Alison B Albers¹, Michael Siegel¹, Debbie M Cheng², Lois Biener³, Nancy A Rigotti⁴

¹ Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
² Biostatistics Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
³ Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
⁴ General Medicine Division and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Albers
Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, TW2, Boston, MA 02118, USA; aalbers{at}bu.edu

Objective: To examine the effect of smoking regulations in local restaurants on anti-smoking attitudes and quitting behaviours among adult smokers.

Design: Hierarchical linear modelling (HLM) was used to assess the relationship between baseline strength of town-level restaurant smoking regulation and follow-up (1) perceptions of the social acceptability of smoking and (2) quitting behaviours.

Setting: Each of the 351 Massachusetts towns was classified as having strong (complete smoking ban) or weak (all other and no smoking restrictions) restaurant smoking regulations.

Subjects: 1712 adult smokers of Massachusetts aged 18 years at baseline who were interviewed via random-digit-dial telephone survey in 2001–2 and followed up 2 years later.

Main outcome measures: Perceived social acceptability of smoking in restaurants and bars, and making a quit attempt and quitting smoking.

Results: Among adult smokers who had made a quit attempt at baseline, living in a town with a strong regulation was associated with a threefold increase in the odds of making a quit attempt at follow-up (OR = 3.12; 95% CI 1.51 to 6.44). Regulation was found to have no effect on cessation at follow-up. A notable, although marginal, effect of regulation was observed for perceiving smoking in bars as socially unacceptable only among smokers who reported at baseline that smoking in bars was socially unacceptable.

Conclusions: Although local restaurant smoking regulations did not increase smoking cessation rates, they did increase the likelihood of making a quit attempt among smokers who had previously tried to quit, and seem to reinforce anti-social smoking norms among smokers who already viewed smoking in bars as socially unacceptable.

Abbreviations: HLM, hierarchical linear modelling

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Brown, A., Moodie, C., Hastings, G. (2009). A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 924-932 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hahn, E. J., Rayens, M. K., Langley, R. E., Darville, A., Dignan, M. (2009). Time since smoke-free law and smoking cessation behaviors. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 1011-1015 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fiore, M. C., Baker, T. B. (2009). Stealing a March in the 21st Century: Accelerating Progress in the 100-Year War Against Tobacco Addiction in the United States. AJPH 99: 1170-1175 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Thrasher, J. F., Boado, M., Sebrie, E. M., Bianco, E. (2009). Smoke-free policies and the social acceptability of smoking in Uruguay and Mexico: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 591-599 [Abstract] [Full Text]