Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2007;16:119-126; doi:10.1136/tc.2006.018002
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conley Thomson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rigotti, N. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conley Thomson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rigotti, N. A

RESEARCH PAPER

Effect of local youth-access regulations on progression to established smoking among youths in Massachusetts

Carey Conley Thomson1,2, William L Hamilton3, Michael B Siegel4, Lois Biener5, Nancy A Rigotti1

1 From the Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
2 Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
3 CNU Associates, Lincoln, Massachusetts, USA
4 Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
5 Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Boston all in Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr N A Rigotti
Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, 50 Staniford Street, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA; nrigotti{at}partners.org

Objective: To test whether community-level restrictions on youth access to tobacco (including both ordinances and enforcement) are associated with less smoking initiation or less progression to established smoking among adolescents.

Design: Prospective cohort study of a random sample of adolescents in Massachusetts whose smoking status was assessed by telephone interviews at baseline and 2-year follow-up, and linked to a state-wide database of town-level youth-access ordinances and enforcement practices.

Participants: A random sample of 2623 adolescents aged 12–17 years who lived in 295 towns in Massachusetts in 2001–2 and were followed in 2003–4.

Main outcome measures: The relationship between the strength of local youth access restrictions (including both ordinances and level of enforcement) and (1) never-smokers’ smoking initiation rates and (2) experimenters’ rate of progression to established smoking was tested in a multilevel analysis that accounted for town-level clustering and adjusted for potential individual, household and town-level confounders.

Results: Over 2 years, 21% of 1986 never-smokers initiated smoking and 25% of 518 experimenters became established smokers. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for smoking initiation was 0.89 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.31) for strong versus weak youth-access policies and 0.93 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.29) for medium versus weak policies. The adjusted OR for progression to established smoking among adolescents who had experimented with smoking was 0.79 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.39) for strong versus weak local smoking restrictions and 0.85 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.45) for medium versus weak restrictions.

Conclusions: This prospective cohort study found no association between community-level youth-access restrictions and adolescents’ rate of smoking initiation or progression to established smoking over 2 years.


Abbreviations: MTCP, Massachusetts Tobacco-Control Program







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.