HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schick, S. F Articles by Glantz, S. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schick, S. F Articles by Glantz, S. A

Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr S F Schick
UCSF Box 0854, San Francisco, CA 94143-0854, USA; suzaynn.schick{at}ucsf.edu

ABSTRACT
When, as a condition of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) in 1998, US tobacco companies disbanded the Council for Tobacco Research and the Center for Indoor Air Research, they lost a vital connection to scientists in academia and the private sector. The aim of this paper was to investigate two new research projects funded by US tobacco companies by analysis of internal tobacco industry documents now available at the University of California San Francisco (San Francisco, California, USA) Legacy tobacco documents library, other websites and the open scientific literature. Since the MSA, individual US tobacco companies have replaced their industry-wide collaborative granting organisations with new, individual research programmes. Philip Morris has funded a directed research project through the non-profit Life Sciences Research Office, and British American Tobacco and its US subsidiary Brown and Williamson have funded the non-profit Institute for Science and Health. Both of these organisations have downplayed or concealed their true level of involvement with the tobacco industry. Both organisations have key members with significant and long-standing financial relationships with the tobacco industry. Regulatory officials and policy makers need to be aware that the studies these groups publish may not be as independent as they seem.

Abbreviations: BAT, British-American Tobacco; CIAR, Center for Indoor Air Research; CTR, Council for Tobacco Research; IFSH, Institute For Science and Health; LSRO, Life Sciences Research Office; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement

eLetters: