RESEARCH PAPER

Legislation reduces exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke in New Zealand bars by about 90%

Dinusha Fernando¹, Jefferson Fowles², Alistair Woodward³, Annemarie Christophersen¹, Stuart Dickson¹, Matthew Hosking¹, Richard Berezowski¹, Rod A Lea¹

¹ Institute for Environmental Science Research (ESR), Wellington, New Zealand
² Bayer CropScience, Sophia Antipolis, France
³ School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R A Lea
Institute of Environmental Science and Research, 34 Kenepuru Drive, Porirua 6009, New Zealand; rod.lea{at}esr.cri.nz

Aim: To measure exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) in New Zealand bars before and after comprehensive smoke-free legislation enacted on 10 December 2004.

Methods: Cotinine is the main specific metabolite of nicotine and a well-established biomarker for SHS exposure. We measured cotinine levels in saliva of non-smoking volunteers before and after a 3 h visit to 30 randomly selected bars in 3 cities across the country. Two measures of cotinine before the smoke-free law change during winter and spring 2004, and two follow-up measurements in the same volunteers and venues during winter and spring 2005, were included.

Results: Before the smoke-free law change, in all bars and in all volunteers, exposure to SHS was evident with an average increase in saliva cotinine of 0.66 ng/ml (SE 0.03 ng/ml). Increases in cotinine correlated strongly with the volunteers’ subjective observation of ventilation, air quality and counts of lit cigarettes. However, even venues that were judged to be "seemingly smoke free" with "good ventilation" produced discernable levels of SHS exposure. After the law change, there remained some exposure to SHS, but at much lower levels (mean saliva cotinine increase of 0.08 ng/ml, SE 0.01 ng/ml). Smoking indoors in bars was almost totally eliminated: in 2005 only one lit cigarette was observed in 30 visits.

Conclusions: Comprehensive smoke-free legislation in New Zealand seems to have reduced exposure of bar patrons to SHS by about 90%. Residual exposures to SHS in bars do not result from illicit smoking indoors.

Abbreviations: SHS, second-hand smoke

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hyland, A., Hassan, L. M., Higbee, C., Boudreau, C., Fong, G. T., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., Yan, M., Thompson, M. E., Hastings, G. (2009). The impact of smokefree legislation in Scotland: results from the Scottish ITC Scotland/UK longitudinal surveys. Eur J Public Health 19: 198-205 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lazuras, L, Eiser, J R, Rodafinos, A (2009). Predicting smokers' non-compliance with smoking restrictions in public places. Tobacco Control 18: 127-131 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gotz, N. K., van Tongeren, M., Wareing, H., Wallace, L. M., Semple, S., MacCalman, L. (2008). Changes in air quality and second-hand smoke exposure in hospitality sector businesses after introduction of the English Smoke-free legislation. J Public Health (Oxf) 30: 421-428 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hyland, A, Travers, M J, Dresler, C, Higbee, C, Cummings, K M (2008). A 32-country comparison of tobacco smoke derived particle levels in indoor public places. Tobacco Control 17: 159-165 [Abstract] [Full Text]