Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2007;16:285-288; doi:10.1136/tc.2007.020271
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

BRIEF REPORT

The 5A’s vs 3A’s plus proactive quitline referral in private practice dental offices: preliminary results

Judith S Gordon1, Judy A Andrews1, Karen M Crews2, Thomas J Payne2, Herbert H Severson1

1 Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA
2 University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MI, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Judith S Gordon
PhD, Oregon Research Institute, 1715 Franklin Blvd, Eugene, OR 97405, USA; judith{at}ori.org

ABSTRACT

Aims: The primary aim of our randomised control trial (RCT) was to evaluate the relative efficacy of two dental office based interventions compared to usual care. One intervention consisted of a combination of dental practitioner advice to quit and proactive telephone counselling (3A’s), and the other arm consisted of a dental practitioner delivered intervention based on the 5A’s of the Clinical Practice Guideline (5A’s).

Method: 2177 tobacco using patients were enrolled from 68 dental practices in Mississippi. We collected 3-month outcome data from 76% (n = 1652) of participants.

Results: Smokers in the two intervention conditions quit at a higher rate than those in usual care; {chi}2 (1, n = 1381) = 3.10, p<0.05. Although not significant, more patients in the 5A’s condition quit than those in the 3A’s. Of patients in the 3A’s Condition, 50% reported being asked by their dentist or hygienists about fax referral to the quitline, and 35% were referred. Quitline counsellors contacted 143 (70%) referred participants.

Conclusion: These results suggest that there are both advantages and disadvantages to the use of quitlines as an adjunct to brief counselling provided by dental practitioners. Patients receiving quitline counselling quit at higher rates than those who did not; however, only a small percentage of patients received counselling from the quitline. Therefore, it appears that dental professionals may be most effective in helping their patients to quit by regularly providing the 5A’s plus proactively referring only those patients who are highly motivated to a quitline for more intensive counselling.

Abbreviations: CME, continuing medical education; RCT, randomised control trial; ST, smokeless tobacco

Keywords: smoking cessation; quitlines; dental; randomised control trial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Borland, R., Balmford, J., Bishop, N., Segan, C., Piterman, L., McKay-Brown, L., Kirby, C., Tasker, C. (2008). In-practice management versus quitline referral for enhancing smoking cessation in general practice: a cluster randomized trial. Fam Pract 25: 382-389 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.