Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2007;16:384-389; doi:10.1136/tc.2007.021485
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D. E
Right arrow Articles by Rigotti, N. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D. E
Right arrow Articles by Rigotti, N. A

RESEARCH PAPERS

Use of nicotine replacement therapy to reduce or delay smoking but not to quit: prevalence and association with subsequent cessation efforts

Douglas E Levy1,2, Anne N Thorndike2, Lois Biener3, Nancy A Rigotti1,2

1 Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
2 Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
3 Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts-Boston, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence to:
Douglas E Levy, PhD, Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, 9th floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA; douglas_levy{at}hms2.harvard.edu

Objective: To assess the prevalence of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use for purposes other than quitting smoking and examine the relation of this non-standard NRT use (NSNRT) with subsequent smoking cessation efforts.

Design: A population based cohort study of adult smokers who were interviewed by telephone at baseline (2001–2) and at two year follow-up. The association between NSNRT use to cut down on smoking or to delay smoking before baseline and cessation attempts and smoking outcomes at two year follow-up was assessed using logistic regression to adjust for multiple potential confounding factors.

Setting: Massachusetts, USA.

Subjects: 1712 adult smokers in Massachusetts who were selected using a random digit dial telephone survey.

Main outcome measures: Quit attempt in 12 months before follow-up, NRT use at quit attempt in 12 months before follow-up, smoking cessation by follow-up, or 50% reduction in cigarettes smoked per day between baseline and follow-up.

Results: 18.7% of respondents reported ever having used NSNRT. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, there was no statistically significant association between past NSNRT use and quit attempts (ORcut down = 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.33; ORdelay = 1.29, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.29), smoking cessation (ORcut down = 0.74, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.24; ORdelay = 1.22, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.50) or 50% reduction in cigarettes smoked per day (ORcut down = 0.93, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.38; ORdelay = 0.80, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.49) at follow-up. Past use of NRT to cut down on cigarettes was associated with use of NRT at a follow-up quit attempt (ORcut down = 2.28, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.47) but past use of NRT to delay smoking was not (ORdelay = 1.25, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.34).

Conclusions: Use of NRT for reasons other than quitting smoking may be more common than was previously estimated. This population based survey finds no strong evidence that NRT use for purposes other than quitting smoking is either harmful or helpful.


Abbreviations: NRT, nicotine replacement therapy; NSNRT, non-standard nicotine replacement therapy; OTC, over the counter

Keywords: smoking cessation; nicotine replacement therapy; reduce to quit; Massachusetts







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.