HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swartz Woods, S. Articles by Haskins, A. E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swartz Woods, S. Articles by Haskins, A. E

Increasing reach of quitline services in a US state with comprehensive tobacco treatment

¹ Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME 04102, USA
² Center for Tobacco Independence, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA

Correspondence to:
Susan Swartz Woods, Portland VA Medical Center, 3710 SW US Veteran Hospital Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA; woodssus{at}ohsu.edu

Objective: The population reach of tobacco quitlines is an important measure of treatment seeking and penetration of services. Maine offers an opportunity to examine temporal changes in quitline reach and referral sources in the context of a comprehensive tobacco treatment programme. The impact of a $1.00 cigarette tax increase is also examined.

Methods: This is a descriptive analysis of Maine Tobacco Helpline call volume September 2001 to December 2006. Annual reach was estimated using a cross sectional state surveillance survey. Weekly call volume was examined during 2005, a year of marked changes in tobacco taxes and quitline resources. Referral patterns were analysed yearly.

Results: Maine’s Tobacco Helpline observed more than a threefold increase in population reach during a four year interval, from 1.9% to over 6% per year. Calls increased substantially in 2005, concurrent with added hours of operation and a rise in the cigarette tax. Over time, callers increasingly reported hearing about the quitline from health professionals, from 10% in 2001 to 38% in 2006.

Conclusions: Tobacco treatment programmes offering free nicotine therapy and professional medical education can drive quitline utilisation over time. Call volume can also be affected by quitline operational and policy changes that promote the reduction of tobacco use.

Abbreviations: BRFFS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey; MSA, Master Settlement Agreement; NRT, nicotine replacement therapy; PTM, Partnership for A Tobacco-Free Maine

Keywords: tobacco; smoking; quitline; counselling; nicotine; medical education

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Lichtenstein Quitlines Tob. Control, December 1, 2007; 16(Suppl_1): i1 - i2. [Full Text] [PDF]