Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2007;16(Supplement 1 ):i81-i86; doi:10.1136/tc.2007.020701
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C M
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, S-H
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C M
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, S-H

SUPPLEMENT

Tobacco quitlines: looking back and looking ahead

C M Anderson, S-H Zhu

University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

Correspondence to:
Christopher Anderson, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0905, La Jolla, CA 92093-0905, USA; cmanderson{at}ucsd.edu

Telephone based tobacco cessation services, or quitlines, have become central components of many comprehensive tobacco control programmes. This paper provides an overview of their history, noting milestones in the growth of quitlines. Key factors in their worldwide adoption were solid evidence from clinical trials with large community samples and strong backing from public health officials. Quitlines are now available throughout most of North America, Europe, Australia and in many other locations around the world. The paper also offers several recommendations for future directions in quitline practice and research. Benchmarks should be established for key areas of quitline implementation, such as accessibility, quality and cost efficiency. Advances in pharmacotherapy, telephony and web based applications should be investigated for opportunities to expand service offerings. Research and development are needed to determine how best to serve a diverse clientele in the most cost effective manner. Funding should be expanded and diversified to enable quitlines to serve much larger numbers of users. Healthcare providers should be targeted for quitline promotion, to engage them in a broad effort to increase the number of patients receiving cessation messages from clinicians. The goal of quitline promotion should expand to include an increase in unaided quit attempts in the population. Early research findings were quickly adopted in quitline practice, and future research to answer questions that have arisen through the implementation of quitlines will probably also find quick adoption.


Keywords: tobacco cessation; quitlines; cessation policy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E. Lichtenstein
Quitlines
Tob. Control, December 1, 2007; 16(Suppl_1): i1 - i2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S. E Cummins, L. Bailey, S. Campbell, C. Koon-Kirby, and S.-H. Zhu
Tobacco cessation quitlines in North America: a descriptive study
Tob. Control, December 1, 2007; 16(Suppl_1): i9 - i15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.