Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 4 April 2008. doi:10.1136/tc.2007.022582
Tobacco Control 2008;17:198-204
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
tc.2007.022582v1
17/3/198    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenfield, S A
Right arrow Articles by Colditz, G A
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenfield, S A
Right arrow Articles by Colditz, G A

RESEARCH PAPERS

Comparison of aspects of smoking among the four histological types of lung cancer

S A Kenfield1,2, E K Wei2, M J Stampfer1,2, B A Rosner2,3, G A Colditz4

1 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
2 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
3 Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
4 Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Correspondence to:
S A Kenfield, Channing Laboratory, 181 Longwood Ave, Fourth Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA; skenfiel{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Background: The magnitude of the link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer may vary by histological type.

Methods: We used polytomous logistic regression to evaluate whether aspects of smoking have different effects across four histological types in the Nurses’ Health Study.

Results: From 1976 to 2002, we identified 1062 cases of lung cancer: squamous cell (n = 201), small cell (n = 236), adenocarcinoma (n = 543) and large cell carcinoma (n = 82), among 65 560 current or former smokers. Risk reduction after quitting ranged from an 8% reduction (relative risk (RR): 0.92, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.94) to a 17% reduction (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.86) per year for adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma, respectively, with a 9% reduction observed for large cell carcinoma and an 11% reduction observed for squamous cell carcinoma. The association of age at smoking initiation and former cigarette smoking was similar across types, while the association of smoking duration differed. The risk of adenocarcinoma increased by 6% per year of smoking, compared to 7% for large cell, 10% for squamous cell and 12% for small cell. The 6% difference between adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma is equivalent to a 3.2 to 9.7-fold increase in risk for 20 years of smoking.

Conclusions: The effects of the number of cigarettes smoked per day and years since quitting smoking are different across the major types of lung cancer, which are fully appreciated at long durations of smoking and smoking cessation. Smoking prevention and cessation should continue to be the focus of public health efforts to reduce lung cancer incidence and mortality.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.