Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 9 October 2008. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.026476
Tobacco Control 2008;17:391-398
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH PAPERS

"Working to shape what society’s expectations of us should be": Philip Morris’ societal alignment strategy

J S Yang1, R E Malone2

1 Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
2 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA

R E Malone, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street Suite 455, San Francisco, California, USA 94118; ruth.malone{at}ucsf.edu

Background: A key element of Philip Morris’s (PM’s) corporate social responsibility initiatives is "societal alignment", defined as "strategies and programs to meet society’s expectations of a responsible tobacco company". This study explored the genesis and implementation of Philip Morris' (PM) societal alignment efforts.

Methods: The study retrieved and analysed approximately 375 previously undisclosed PM documents now available electronically. Using an iterative process, the study categorised themes and prepared a case analysis.

Results: Beginning in 1999, PM sought to become "societally aligned" by identifying expectations of a responsible tobacco company through public opinion research and developing and publicising programs to meet those expectations. Societal alignment was undertaken within the US and globally to ensure an environment favourable to PM’s business objectives. Despite PM’s claims to be "changing", however, societal alignment in practice was highly selective. PM responded to public "expectations" largely by retooling existing positions and programs, while entirely ignoring other expectations that might have interfered with its business goals. It also appears that convincing employees of the value and authenticity of societal alignment was difficult.

Conclusions: As implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control proceeds, tobacco control advocates should closely monitor development of such "alignment" initiatives and expose the motivations and contradictions they reveal.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Malone, R. E, Smith, E. A (2009). Contact me soon!!! Confidential, risk-free opportunity!. Tobacco Control 18: 249-249 [Full Text]  
  • Hastings, G., Liberman, J. (2009). Tobacco corporate social responsibility and fairy godmothers: the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control slays a modern myth. Tobacco Control 18: 73-74 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.