Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2008;17:426-427; doi:10.1136/tc.2008.027763
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

SPECIAL COMMUNICATION

No need for nanny

M Daube, J Stafford, L Bond

Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia

Correspondence to:
M Daube, Public Health Advocacy Institute of Western Australia, Health Research Campus, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia; m.daube{at}curtin.edu.au

The term "nanny state" is regularly used to attack health groups or governments, especially by interest groups bereft of arguments and journalists in search of a cliché. It has become a special favourite of tobacco companies and their supporters. In the present work we argue that the term should be retired in favour of genuine debate on substantive issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.