Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2008;17(Supplement 1):i1-i5; doi:10.1136/tc.2006.019166
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

SUPPLEMENT

How do different cigarette design features influence the standard tar yields of popular cigarette brands sold in different countries?

R J O’Connor1, D Hammond2, A McNeill3, B King4, L T Kozlowski5, G A Giovino5, K M Cummings1

1 Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
2 Department of Health Studies & Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
3 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK
4 VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, The Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
5 Department of Health Behavior, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr R J O’Connor, Department of Health Behavior, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; richard.oconnor{at}roswellpark.org

Objectives: To examine the associations among cigarette design features and tar yields of leading cigarette brands sold in the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom.

Methods: Government reports and numbers listed on packs were used to obtain data on International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/Federal Trade Commission (FTC) yields for the tar of 172 cigarette varieties sold in the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. We used standardised methods to measure the following 11 cigarette design parameters: filter ventilation, cigarette pressure drop, filter pressure drop, tobacco rod length, filter length, cigarette diameter, tipping paper length, tobacco weight, filter weight, rod density and filter density.

Results: Filter ventilation was found to be the predominant design feature accounting for the variations between brands in ISO/FTC tar yields in each of the four countries. After accounting for filter ventilation, design parameters such as overwrap length, tobacco weight and rod density played comparatively minor roles in determining tar yields.

Conclusions: Variation in ISO/FTC tar yields are predicted by a limited set of cigarette design features, especially filter ventilation, suggesting that governments should consider mandatory disclosure of cigarette design parameters as part of comprehensive tobacco product regulations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.