Tobacco Control, Vol 6, 213-218, Copyright © 1997 by BMJ Publishing Group

Question 1 tobacco education expenditures in Massachusetts, USA

ME Begay and SA Glantz
Department of Community Health Studies, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA. begay@schoolph.umass.edu

BACKGROUND: In 1992, voters in Massachusetts (United States) approved Question 1, a state ballot initiative, which raised the state excise tax to provide funds for tobacco education. OBJECTIVE: To examine Question 1 expenditures for tobacco-specific programmes in the 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 fiscal years. DESIGN: This study examined trends in Question 1 expenditures. Data were collected from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the Massachusetts Department of Revenue for the 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 fiscal years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The amount of spending on tobacco-specific programmes. RESULTS: Excluding the 1994 fiscal year because the state allocated 18 months of new revenues, from the 1995 fiscal year to the projected 1997 fiscal year, the state will have spent 22% of Question 1 funds for tobacco- specific programmes. Question 1 expenditures for tobacco-specific programmes have declined by 15%, whereas Question 1 expenditures for the other programmes decreased only 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The legislature has established a trend that has produced real reductions in Question 1 funding for tobacco education, which appears contrary to the mandate of the voters when they enacted Question 1 in 1992. These reductions undermine the effectiveness of tobacco-specific programmes that are an integral part of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Programme. These results also highlight the fact that the initial compromises made after initiatives such as Question 1 are adopted have important long-term consequences for funding of tobacco control initiatives.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ibrahim, J. K., Glantz, S. A. (2007). The Rise and Fall of Tobacco Control Media Campaigns, 1967 2006. AJPH 97: 1383-1396 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tsoukalas, T H, Glantz, S A (2003). Development and destruction of the first state funded anti-smoking campaign in the USA. Tobacco Control 12: 214-220 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Robbins, H., Krakow, M. (2000). Evolution of a comprehensive tobacco control programme: building system capacity and strategic partnerships{---}lessons from Massachusetts. Tobacco Control 9: 423-430 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wakefield, M., Chaloupka, F. (2000). Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA. Tobacco Control 9: 177-186 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pechmann, C., Reibling, E. T. (2000). Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: case studies from USA and Canada. Tobacco Control 9 : ii18-ii31 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Goldman, L. K, Glantz, S. A (1999). The passage and initial implementation of Oregon's Measure 44. Tobacco Control 8: 311-322 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bialous, S. A., Glantz, S. A (1999). Arizona's tobacco control initiative illustrates the need for continuing oversight by tobacco control advocates. Tobacco Control 8: 141-151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Goldman, L. K., Glantz, S. A. (1998). Evaluation of Antismoking Advertising Campaigns. JAMA 279: 772-777 [Abstract] [Full Text]