Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 1997;6:332-336; doi:10.1136/tc.6.4.332
Copyright © 1997 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Tobacco Control, Vol 6, 332-336, Copyright © 1997 by BMJ Publishing Group


ARTICLES

State legislators' perceptions of lobbyists and lobbying on tobacco control issues

JE Cohen, AO Goldstein, BS Flynn, MC Munger, NH Gottlieb, LJ Solomon and GS Dana
Department of Health Policy and Administration, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. jcohen@arf.org

OBJECTIVE: To determine state legislators' perceptions about health and tobacco lobbyists, their frequency of contact with these lobbyists, and the amount of campaign contributions from health professional organisations and the tobacco industry. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: State legislators from North Carolina, Texas, and Vermont (USA), serving in 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceptions about lobbyists representing the tobacco industry, non-profit health organisations, and state medical societies with respect to their credibility, importance as sources of information, and persuasiveness; extent of lobbying activities; campaign contributions from health professional organisations and the tobacco industry. RESULTS: Almost all legislators reported that medical society and non-profit health organisation lobbyists are credible on tobacco issues and just over half believed that these lobbyists are important sources of information. More legislators said they could be persuaded by medical and health lobbyists than by tobacco lobbyists. Although health professional Political Action Committees (PACs) gave campaign contributions to more state legislators, and gave higher amounts on average, than tobacco PACs, legislators reported less contact with medical society lobbyists than tobacco lobbyists about tobacco issues. CONCLUSIONS: State legislators have positive attitudes toward lobbyists for non-profit health organisations and state medical societies regarding tobacco issues. These groups may be an underused resource for educating legislators about tobacco control measures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lowery, D., Gray, V., Benz, J., Deason, M., Kirkland, J., Sykes, J. (2009). Understanding the Relationship between Health PACs and Health Lobbying in the American States. Publius 39: 70-94 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brownson, R. C., Chriqui, J. F., Stamatakis, K. A. (2009). Understanding Evidence-Based Public Health Policy. AJPH 99: 1576-1583 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gottlieb, N. H., Goldstein, A. O., Flynn, B. S., Cohen, J. E., Bauman, K. E., Solomon, L. J., Munger, M. C., Dana, G. S., McMorris, L. E. (2003). State Legislators' Beliefs About Legislation That Restricts Youth Access to Tobacco Products. Health Educ Behav 30: 209-224 [Abstract]  
  • Bero, L. A, Montini, T., Bryan-Jones, K., Mangurian, C. (2001). Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions. Tobacco Control 10: 329-336 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Montini, T., Bero, L. A (2001). Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development. Tobacco Control 10: 218-224 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.