Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 1998;7:134-140; doi:10.1136/tc.7.2.134
Copyright © 1998 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tob Control 1998;7:134-140 ( Summer )

Perception of foreign cigarettes and their advertising in China: a study of college students from 12 universities

Shu-Hong Zhua, Dewei Lia, Buoling Fengb, Tong Zhuc, Christopher M Andersona

a University of California, San Diego, California, USA, b Beijing Institute of Social Psychology, Beijing, China, c Wenzhou Tumour Hospital, Wenzhou, China

Correspondence to: Dr Shu-Hong Zhu, Cancer Center, 0905, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0905, USA. szhu{at}ucsd.edu

OBJECTIVE---To examine how deeply foreign cigarette advertising had penetrated the Chinese market when a new ban on cigarette advertising was enacted in February 1995.
DESIGN---A survey using self-completion questionnaires administered in college classrooms from November 1994 to March 1995.
SETTINGS---Eight universities and four medical schools in three Chinese cities: Beijing, Wenzhou, and Hangzhou.
SUBJECTS---1896 college students who agreed to complete a written questionnaire. The mean age was 21.2 years; 39.5% of respondents were female.
RESULTS---Four of the top eight cigarette brands most familiar to the respondents were foreign: Marlboro, 555, Kent, and Hilton. Advertisements for the foreign brands were much more likely to be seen than those for the domestic brands; those for Marlboro were reported most often (29.7%), followed by 555 (21.8%) and Kent (18.1%). Among smokers, Marlboro was the most preferred foreign brand, by 44.2%. The preference for Marlboro was also correlated with smokers having seen its advertisements. Most respondents, 71.8%, believed that cigarette advertising should be banned.
CONCLUSIONS---The previous restrictions on cigarette advertising in China failed to prevent a large portion of the population from seeing and understanding the advertisements. Before the 1995 advertising ban took effect, strict limitations on imports of foreign cigarettes notwithstanding, certain highly advertised brands such as Marlboro achieved wide recognition and even consumer preference. Stricter restrictions are suggested as previous ones have failed to achieve their intended effects.


Keywords: China; advertising; brand preferences


© 1998 by Tobacco Control

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mao, R., Li, X., Stanton, B., Wang, J., Hong, Y., Zhang, H., Chen, X. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of cigarette smoking among college students in China. Health Educ Res 24: 105-118 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ho, M. G, Shi, Y., Ma, S., Novotny, T. E (2007). Perceptions of tobacco advertising and marketing that might lead to smoking initiation among Chinese high school girls. Tobacco Control 16: 359-360 [Full Text]  
  • Hafez, N, Ling, P M (2005). How Philip Morris built Marlboro into a global brand for young adults: implications for international tobacco control. Tobacco Control 14: 262-271 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • HASTINGS, G., MacFADYEN, L. (1998). Smoking, branding, and the meaning of life. Tobacco Control 7: 107-108 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.