Comparison of two self-help smoking cessation booklets
Kevin P Balandaa, John B Lowea, Mary-Louise O'Connor-Flemingb
a Centre for Health
Promotion and Cancer Prevention Research, University of Queensland
Medical School, Herston, Queensland, Australia, b Queensland University of
Technology, School of Public Health, Kelvin Grove
Correspondence to: Dr KP Balanda, Centre for Health Promotion and Cancer Prevention Research, University of Queensland Medical School, Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; K.Balanda{at}mailbox.uq.edu.au
OBJECTIVE
To compare
two self-help smoking cessation booklets distributed to callers to a
Quitline telephone service in Queensland (Australia).
DESIGN
Callers were
randomised to receive either a structured 14-day quit programme
(Time to quit) or another booklet that
described four broad stages of quitting (Can
quit). Approximately one month later, these callers were
interviewed by telephone.
MAIN OUTCOME
MEASURES
Self-reported smoking status at one month
and recent quit attempts together with process measures.
RESULTS
Altogether,
521 callers (78.3%) were interviewed. They were heavier smokers when
compared with all Queensland smokers: on average they had smoked for
more than 15 years, smoked nearly 25 cigarettes per day, and almost
two-thirds had attempted to quit smoking in the past year. In each
group, significant proportions either did not begin to use the booklet
(50.5-56.0%), or did not complete its use (77.4-82.3%). There were
no differences in the self-reported quit rates at one month (17.0%
vs 16.1%; p = 0.93). In an ordinal
regression modelling procedure involving age, sex, number of recent
quit attempts, number of cigarettes smoked per day, smoking status of
partner, number of five closest friends who smoke, education, and
booklet received, only the number of cigarettes smoked per day was
significantly related to smoking status at one month.
CONCLUSIONS
Callers to
telephone Quitline services are typically heavier smokers than the
general smoking population, and simple strategies, such as self-help
booklets, appear to achieve relatively high success. Nevertheless,
there is potential to improve the effectiveness of these materials by
making a range of materials available and encouraging callers to make a
serious attempt to quit smoking.
Keywords: smoking cessation; self-help materials; telephone quitlines
© 1999 by Tobacco Control
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Siahpush, M., Wakefield, M., Spittal, M., Durkin, S.
(2007). Antismoking television advertising and socioeconomic variations in calls to Quitline. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
61: 298-301
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Abdullah, A S M, Lam, T-H, Chan, S S C, Hedley, A J
(2004). Which smokers use the smoking cessation Quitline in Hong Kong, and how effective is the Quitline?. Tobacco Control
13: 415-421
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Carroll, T, Rock, B
(2003). Generating Quitline calls during Australia's National Tobacco Campaign: effects of television advertisement execution and programme placement. Tobacco Control
12: ii40-44
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
