Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poland, B. D
Right arrow Articles by Raphael, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poland, B. D
Right arrow Articles by Raphael, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tobacco use
Right arrow Other Public Health
Tob Control 2000;9:364-371 ( Winter )

Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions

Blake D Polanda, Joanna E Cohena, Mary J Ashleya, Ed Adlafb, Roberta Ferrencec, Linda L Pedersond, Shelley B Bulle, Dennis Raphaelf

a Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, and Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, b Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, c Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, d Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Moorehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, e Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, and Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, f Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto

Correspondence to: Professor Blake Poland, Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, McMurrich Building, 12 Queen's Park Crescent West, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada; blake.poland{at}utoronto.ca

Received 8 October 1999; Revision received 19 May 2000; Accepted 1 June 2000

OBJECTIVE---To determine if smokers and non-smokers cluster into meaningful, discrete subgroups with distinguishable attitudes and behaviours regarding smoking and smoking restrictions.
DESIGN---Qualitative research with 45 smokers guided development of questionnaire items applied in a population based telephone survey of 432 current smokers and 1332 non-smokers in Ontario, Canada.
METHODS---Cluster analysis of questionnaire items used to categorise adult smokers and non-smokers; comparison of clusters on sociodemographic characteristics and composite knowledge and attitude scores.
RESULTS---Smokers clustered in three groups. "Reluctant" smokers (16%) show more concern about other people discovering that they smoke, but parallel "easygoing" smokers (42%) in supporting restrictions on smoking and not smoking around others. "Adamant" smokers (42%) feel restrictions have gone too far, and are less likely to accommodate non-smokers. Significant gradients across categories in the expected direction were observed with respect to smoking status, stage of change, knowledge, and attitude scores, and predicted compliance with restrictions, validating the proposed typology. Non-smokers also clustered into three groups, of which the "adamant" non-smokers (45%) are the least favourably disposed to smoking. "Unempowered" non-smokers (34%) also oppose smoking, but tend not to act on it. "Laissez-faire" non-smokers (21%) are less opposed to smoking in both attitude and behaviour. A significant gradient across categories in the expected direction was observed with respect to composite scores regarding knowledge of the health effects of active and passive smoking and a composite score on support for restrictions on smoking in public places.
CONCLUSION---Recognition and consideration of the types of smokers and non-smokers in the population and their distinguishing characteristics could inform the development of tobacco control policies and programmes and suggest strategies to assist implementation.


Keywords: smokers; non-smokers; attitudes; smoking restrictions; typology; cluster


© 2000 by Tobacco Control



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J-G Park, J W Park, D-W Kim, H-G Seo, B-H Nam, J S Lee, J C Choi, I S Kim, and P Boyle
Factors influencing attitudes to legislation banning the manufacture and sale of tobacco products
Tob. Control, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 142 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
A. Victoir, A Eertmans, S Van den Broucke, and O Van den Bergh
Smoking status moderates the contribution of social-cognitive and environmental determinants to adolescents' smoking intentions
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2006; 21(5): 674 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
P. A. Pilkington, S. Gray, A. B. Gilmore, and N. Daykin
Attitudes towards second hand smoke amongst a highly exposed workforce: survey of London casino workers
J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2006; 28(2): 104 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
D Hennrikus, P R Pentel, and S D Sandell
Preferences and practices among renters regarding smoking restrictions in apartment buildings
Tob. Control, June 1, 2003; 12(2): 189 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.