Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, J. M
Right arrow Articles by Vessey, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, J. M
Right arrow Articles by Vessey, J.
Tob Control 2000;9:382-388 ( Winter )

Patient recall versus physician documentation in report of smoking cessation counselling performed in the inpatient setting

Jessica M Nicholsona, Deborah J Hennrikusb, Harry A Landob, Maribet C McCartyb, John Vesseyb

a Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, b Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Correspondence to: Dr Deborah J Hennrikus, Division of Epidemiology, 1300 South Second Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454-1015, USA; hennrikus{at}epi.umn.edu

Received 13 November 1999; Revision received 17 June 2000; Accepted 27 June 2000

OBJECTIVES---To determine rates of patient reported and physician documented counselling; to identify predictors of each report; and to identify the impact of each report on smoking cessation attempts after discharge from the hospital.
DESIGN---Stickers on subjects' charts prompted physicians to give brief smoking cessation counselling to patients in the hospital. Patients reported counselling received and quit attempts in a phone interview conducted 7-18 days after discharge. Rates of counselling and correlations were calculated, and multivariate analysis identified predictors of patient report, physician documentation, and quit attempts.
SETTING---Four hospitals in the Minneapolis/St Paul metropolitan area.
SUBJECTS---682 hospital patients who had smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and had smoked in the last three months.
RESULTS---71.0% of patients reported counselling, and physicians documented counselling in the charts of 46.2% of patients (correlation = 0.15, kappa  = 0.13). Patient report was predicted by specific hospital, belief that their hospitalisation was smoking related, diagnosis of a smoking related disease, and physician documentation of counselling. Physician documentation was predicted by female patient, specific hospital, longer hospital stay, and marginally predicted by smoking related disease. Quit attempts were predicted by patient report of counselling, but not physician documentation.
CONCLUSIONS---Physicians document counselling in the hospital at a lower rate than patients report it, and the correlation between reports is very low, making an accurate assessment of true rates of counselling difficult. While it is important to increase physician documentation, it is even more important to increase patient recall, as this is the only report that predicts a quit attempt.


Keywords: smoking cessation counselling; patient recall; physician documentation


© 2000 by Tobacco Control



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
M. W. Smith and P. G. Barnett
Direct Measurement of Health Care Costs
Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2003; 60(3_suppl): 74S - 91S.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.