Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, H.
Right arrow Articles by Krakow, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, H.
Right arrow Articles by Krakow, M.
Tob Control 2000;9:423-430 ( Winter )

Special

Evolution of a comprehensive tobacco control programme: building system capacity and strategic partnerships---lessons from Massachusetts Harriet Robbins, Milly Krakow

Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to: Harriet Robbins, EdM, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program, 250 Washington Street, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02108-4619, USA; Harriet.Robbins{at}state.ma.us

Received 9 July 1999; Revision received 13 April 2000; Accepted 21 April 2000

BACKGROUND---Since the passage of a voter approved state referendum in 1992 to establish a 25 cent increase on the excise tax on cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, Massachusetts has received an average of $40 million annually for its tobacco control programme. This funding allowed Massachusetts to expand and develop its tobacco control programme to become one of the most comprehensive in the world.
OBJECTIVES---The development of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program is outlined, focusing on three stages of development: formation, strategic partnership building, and shared leadership.
METHODS---The development of management structures, programmatic infrastructure, communication and partnership networks, and advisory structures are tracked throughout the three phases.
RESULTS---The use of pre-existing public health resources, implementation of a strong training component, a geographical management structure, the creation of public and private partnerships, and the development of a shared leadership model contributed to building consensus and provided the foundation for coordinated approaches to tobacco control.
CONCLUSION---Other states and countries can use lessons learned from Massachusetts about the organisational development of a comprehensive tobacco control programme as they embark upon similar efforts.


Keywords: Massachusetts; infrastructure; system development; tobacco control programme


© 2000 by Tobacco Control



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
J. K. Ibrahim and S. A. Glantz
The Rise and Fall of Tobacco Control Media Campaigns, 1967 2006
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 97(8): 1383 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
H. Fear and P. Barnett
Holding fast: the experience of collaboration in a competitive environment
Health Promot. Int., March 1, 2003; 18(1): 5 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
H K Koh
Accomplishments of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program
Tob. Control, June 1, 2002; 11(90002): ii1 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
H Robbins, M Krakow, and D Warner
Adult smoking intervention programmes in Massachusetts: a comprehensive approach with promising results
Tob. Control, June 1, 2002; 11(90002): ii4 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S Soldz, T W Clark, E Stewart, C Celebucki, and D K. Walker
Decreased youth tobacco use in Massachusetts 1996 to 1999: evidence of tobacco control effectiveness
Tob. Control, June 1, 2002; 11(90002): ii14 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.