Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2008

Tob Control. Published Online First: 26 February 2008. doi:10.1136/tc.2007.020479
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
tc.2007.020479v1
17/3/159    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hyland, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hyland, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, K. M.

RESEARCH PAPERS

A 32-country comparison of tobacco smoke derived particle levels in indoor public places

Andrew Hyland1,3, Mark J Travers1, Carolyn Dresler2, Cheryl Higbee1, K. Michael Cummings1

1 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, United States;
2 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States


ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare tobacco smoke-derived particulate levels in transportation and hospitality venues with and without smoking in 32 countries using a standardized measurement protocol.

Methods: The TSI Sidepak AM510 Personal Aerosol Monitor was used to measure the concentration of particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) in 1,822 bars, restaurants, retail outlets, airports, and other workplaces in 32 geographically dispersed countries between 2003 and 2007.

Results: Geometric mean PM2.5 levels were highest in Syria (372 µg/m3), Romania (366 µg/m3), and Lebanon (346 µg/m3), while they were lowest in the three countries that have nationwide laws prohibiting smoking in indoor public places (Ireland at 22 µg/m3, Uruguay at 18 µg/m3, and New Zealand at 8 µg/m3). On average, the PM2.5 level in places where smoking was observed was 8.9 times greater (95% C.I.: 8.0 to 10) than the level in places where smoking was not observed.

Conclusions: Levels of indoor fine particle air pollution in places with observed smoking are typically greater what than what the World Health Organization and US Environmental Protection Agency have concluded is harmful to human health.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.