Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2008

Tob Control. Published Online First: 19 February 2008. doi:10.1136/tc.2007.022285
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
tc.2007.022285v1
17/3/190    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guindon, G E.
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, M. H
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guindon, G E.
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, M. H

RESEARCH PAPERS

Susceptibility to smoking among south-east Asian youth: A multilevel analysis

G Emmanuel Guindon1, Kathy Georgiades, Michael H Boyle

McMaster University, Canada

To whom correspondence should be addressed. guindoge{at}mcmaster.ca


ABSTRACT
Objective: Among young never-smokers in south-east Asia, to estimate the extent to which susceptibility to smoking is associated with between-context differences (schools and classes) and to identify factors at school, class and individual levels that influence individual susceptibility to smoking.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey conducted in Cambodia (2002), Laos (2003) and Vietnam (2003) are used to conduct multilevel analyses that account for the nesting of students in classes and classes in schools. The outcome variable is smoking susceptibility, defined as the absence of a firm decision not to smoke. Explanatory variables include school (current tobacco use prevalence in school, exposure to anti-smoking media messages, and exposure to tobacco billboard advertising) and class level influences (classroom prevention) and individual level influences (parent and friends smoking behaviour, knowledge of the harmful effects of and exposure to secondhand smoke at home, age, sex and pocket income).

Results: Multilevel analyses indicate that 4.5% and 4.2% of the variation in smoking susceptibility is associated with school and class differences, respectively. Students who have parents or friends who smoke, who are exposed to second-hand smoke at home and those who have access to pocket income are found to be more susceptible while greater knowledge of the harmful effects of second-hand smoke appears to diminish susceptibility to smoking. For girls only, billboard tobacco advertising increases the risk for susceptibility and classroom prevention decreases risk while for boys only, attendance to schools with higher prevalence of tobacco use increases risk for susceptibility and anti-smoking media messages decreases risk.

Conclusions: This study highlights a number of modifiable factors associated with smoking susceptibility and identifies interactions between teen sex and several factors associated with the susceptibility to smoking. This finding provides support to the call to move beyond gender-blind tobacco control policies.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.