Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 February 2009

Tob Control. Published Online First: 23 October 2008. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.026153
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH PAPERS

Comparing the Effects of Entertainment Media and Tobacco Marketing on Youth Smoking

James Sargent1, Jennifer Gibson1 and Todd Heatherton2

1 Dartmouth Medical School, United States;
2 Psychology and Brain Sciences, United States

Correspondence to:
E-mail: james.d.sargent{at}dartmouth.edu

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To examine the concurrent effects of exposure to movie smoking and tobacco marketing receptivity on adolescent smoking onset and progression.

Methods: Cross sectional study of 4524 Northern New England adolescents aged 10-14 in 1999 with longitudinal follow up of 2603 baseline never smokers. Cross-sectional outcomes included ever tried smoking and higher level of lifetime smoking among 784 experimenters. The longitudinal outcome was onset of smoking among baseline never smokers 2 years later. Movie smoking exposure was modeled as four population quartiles (Q), tobacco marketing receptivity included two levels--having a favorite tobacco ad and wanting/owning tobacco promotional items. All analyses controlled for sociodemographics, other social influences, personality characteristics of the adolescent and parenting style.

Results: In the full cross-sectional sample, 17.5% had tried smoking; both exposure to movie smoking and receptivity to tobacco marketing were associated with tried smoking. Among experimental smokers, the majority (64%) were receptive to tobacco marketing, which had a multivariate association with higher level of lifetime smoking (movie smoking did not). In the longitudinal study some 9.5% of baseline never smokers tried smoking at follow up. Fewer never smokers (18.5%) were receptive to tobacco marketing. Movie smoking had a multivariate association with trying smoking (receptivity to tobacco marketing did not).

Conclusions: The results suggest separate roles for entertainment media and tobacco marketing on adolescent smoking. Both exposures deserve equal emphasis from a policy standpoint.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Dewhirst, T. (2009). New directions in tobacco promotion and brand communication. Tobacco Control 18: 161-162 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.