Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2009

Tob Control. Published Online First: 14 June 2009. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.028753
Copyright © 2009 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH PAPERS

Emergency department-initiated tobacco control: a randomised controlled trial in an inner-city university hospital

Bruno Neuner MD MSE1, Edith Weiss-Gerlach1, Peter Miller PhD2, Peter Martus PhD3, Doreen Hesse MD1, Claudia Spies MD1

1 Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Germany;
2 Center for Drug and Alcohol Programs, Medical University of South Carolina, Germany;
3 Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, United States

E-mail: bruno.neuner{at}charite.de

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Emergency department (ED) patients show high smoking rates. We investigated the effects of ED-initiated tobacco control (ETC) on the 7-days abstinence at 12 months.

Methods: Randomized-controlled intention-to-treat trial (Trials Registry no.: ISRCTN41527831 [controlled-trials.com] ) in 1,044 patients in an urban ED. ETC consisted of on-site counselling plus up to 4 telephone booster sessions. Controls received usual care. Analysis was by logistic regression.

Results: Overall 630 (60.7%) were males, the median age was 30 years, (range 18 – 81), and the median smoking intensity was 15 (range 1 – 60) cigarettes per day. Five hundred eighty study participants (55.6%) were unmotivated, 331 (31.7%) were ambivalent, and 133 (12.7%) were motivated smokers. ETC (median time 30 (range 1 – 99) minutes) was administered to 472 (91.7% out of 515) randomized study participants. At follow-up, 685 study participants (65.6% of 1,044) could be contacted. Overall, 73 out of 515 (14.2%) in the ETC group were abstinent, whereas 60 out of 529 (11.3%) controls were abstinent (Odds ratio adjusted for age and gender: 1.31 (95%-confidence interval (0.91 – 1.89), p=0.15). Stratified for motivation to change behavior, the adjusted Odds ratios for ETC versus usual care were 1.00 (95%-confidence interval (0.57 – 1.76)) in unmotivated smokers, respectively 1.37 (95%-confidence interval (0.73 – 2.58)) in ambivalent smokers and 2.19 (95%-confidence interval (0.98 – 4.89)) in motivated smokers, p for trend = 0.29.

Conclusions: ETC, in the form of on-site counselling with up to 4 telephone booster sessions, showed no overall effect on tobacco abstinence after 12 month. A non-significant trend for a better performance of ETC in more motivated smokers was observed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.