Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tob Control. Published Online First: 1 October 2009. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.029736
Copyright © 2009 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

RESEARCH PAPER

Cigarette brand preference as a function of price among smoking youth in Canada: are they smoking premium, discount or native brands?

Scott T Leatherdale1,*, Rashid Ahmed2, Andriana Barisic1, Donna Murnaghan3, Steve Manske4

1 Canacer Care Ontario, Canada;
2 Population Health Research Group, University of Waterloo, Canada;
3 PEI Health Research Institute, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada;
4 Centre for Behavioural Research and Evaluation, Canadian Cancer Society / National Cancer Institute, Canada

Correspondence to: Scott T Leatherdale, Dept. of Population Studies and Surveillance, Canacer Care Ontario, 620 University Ave, Ste 1500, Toronto, M5G 2L7, Canada; scott.leatherdale{at}cancercare.on.ca

Accepted 10 August 2009

Introduction: Given that little is known about the cigarette brand preferences of youth, the current study seeks to characterize cigarette brand preferences and examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands among Canadian youth who are current smokers.

Methods: This study used nationally representative data collected from 71,003 grade 5 to 12 students as part of the 2006-07 Canadian Youth Smoking Survey (YSS). Using data from current smokers, we examined the characteristics associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands relative to smoking premium cigarette brands.

Results: In 2006, premium cigarettes were the most prevalent brand of cigarette youth report usually smoking (49.4%); a substantial number of youth do report usually smoking either discount (12.9%, n=20,700) or native (9.3%, n=15,000) cigarette brands. Occasional smokers were more likely to report usually smoking premium cigarettes whereas daily smokers were more likely to report smoking either discount or native cigarettes. In particular, discount and native brands appear to be appealing among smoking youth with less spending money or those who are heavier smokers compared to youth smoking premium brands.

Conclusion: Discount and native cigarette brands are commonly used by a substantial number of smoking youth in Canada. Additional research is required to better understand the reasons behind different cigarette brand preferences and how youth are able to access premium, discount and illicit native cigarettes. Moreover, ongoing surveillance of the cigarette brand preferences of youth is required for guiding future tobacco control policy and programming activities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.