Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2002;11:287-288; doi:10.1136/tc.11.4.287
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Tobacco Control 2002;11:287-288
© 2002 Tobacco Control

EDITORIAL

Harm reduction

Harm reduction: 25 years later

W A Farone

Applied Power Concepts, Inc, 411 East Julianna Street, Anaheim, CA, 92801, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
William A. Farone, PhD;
farone@appliedpowerconcepts.com


The cigarette industry has managed to avoid any real harm reduction in their products over the years

Keywords: harm reduction products; tobacco industry

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Much has been written in recent issues of Tobacco Control concerning harm reduction products as part of a public health strategy for dealing with tobacco use. The editorial by Kozlowski and colleagues1 advocated medicinal nicotine as part of the plan and discusses risks from other alternatives. They correctly point out that small changes in elimination of toxic ingredients are not very effective in reducing the dangers of smoking. Such small changes in a smoking product that is supposed to be a potentially less risky version of cigarettes actually perpetuate the continued marketing of very hazardous products, especially if the marketers insist that they leave the more risky product on the market. In this issue Breland and colleagues2 discuss another marginally reduced harm product called AdvanceTM. The name is somewhat ironic given that the advance in harm reduction from the viewpoint of chemical exposure appears marginal at best.

. . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cummings, K M., Brown, A., Douglas, C. E (2006). Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective. Tobacco Control 15: iv84-iv89 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Caraballo, R S, Pederson, L L, Gupta, N (2006). New tobacco products: do smokers like them?. Tobacco Control 15: 39-44 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dunsby, J, Bero, L (2004). A nicotine delivery device without the nicotine? Tobacco industry development of low nicotine cigarettes. Tobacco Control 13: 362-369 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.