Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farone, W A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farone, W A
Related Collections
Right arrow Drugs: obstetrics and gynecology
Tobacco Control 2004;13:1-2
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EDITORIAL

Reducing toxins

Accepting premature deaths from smoking

W A Farone

Correspondence to:
W A Farone PhD
Applied Power Concepts, Inc., 411 East Julianna Street, Anaheim, CA, 92801, USA; farone@appliedpowerconcepts.com


Could partial reduction of some toxic components in cigarettes lead to reductions in premature deaths from smoking?

Keywords: tobacco specific nitrosamines

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

If one analyses the suggested means of solving the problem of premature death and disease caused by smoking, the strategies break down into four broad groups. Listed in the order in which I perceive these to have the highest probability of resulting in the most reduction in death to the least these are:

  1. Smoking cessation
  2. Replacement of the pharmacologic (pleasurable) sensations of nicotine in cigarette products with non-cigarette products that can be viewed as providing either medicinal nicotine or analogue chemicals with similar function
  3. Reduction in toxic components of cigarette smoke immediately to levels that are suggested by current science as "acceptable" based on existing dose–response data for cumulative lifetime exposure. (This is a central part of the theme of the California Environmental Protection Agency’s requirements—that is, that there are levels of chemicals for which the risk is not more than "background".)
  4. Partial reductions in some toxic components . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.