Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shatenstein, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shatenstein, S
Related Collections
Right arrow Health effects of tobacco use
Tobacco Control 2004;13:97-99
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EDITORIAL

Smoking and obesity

If it bleeds, it leads: the pathos derby

S Shatenstein

Correspondence to:
Stan Shatenstein
5492-B Trans Island, Montreal, Quebec H3W 3A8; shatensteins@sympatico.ca


Is obesity supplanting smoking as public health enemy number 1?

Keywords: obesity; fat; rimonabant

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In a major recent review of the causes of death in the USA,1 Mokdad and colleagues found, unsurprisingly, that "smoking remains the leading cause of mortality". The authors also concluded, notably, that "poor diet and physical inactivity may soon overtake tobacco as the leading cause of death." The reaction to this news was swift, broad, curious, and instructive.

From around the globe, headlines screamed out variations on the theme: "Fat gains on tobacco as top death factor" (CNN)2; "Combating Killers: Fat, Tobacco" (CBS News)3; "Fat of the land is killing more Americans than cigarettes" (The Times, London)4; "Americans Eating Themselves to Death" (The Scotsman)5; "US government moves to reduce rampant obesity" (Taipei Times)6; "Obésité : le mal du siècle" (Le Figaro, Paris).7

Clearly, Mokdad’s study in JAMA sounded an alarm, but why, and what precisely was the message? Most newspaper reports, derived . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.