Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daynard, R A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daynard, R A
Tobacco Control 2004;13:i3
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


COMMENTARY

FAMRI

How did we get here?

R A Daynard

Correspondence to:
Professor Richard Daynard
Northeastern University School of Law, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Chair, FAMRI Lay Advisory Board; rdaynard@lynx.neu.edu

Keywords: Flight Attendants Medical Research Institute; FAMRI

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

It is rare that science owes a debt to law. To lawmakers, surely, such as those who regularly make generous appropriations to the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. But law, in the sense of the process and products of litigation? It’s hard to imagine.

But this special supplement is deeply in debt to law in just that sense. The funding that supports the research reported on in this special issue owes everything to an unlikely lawsuit. Broin v. Philip Morris, Inc.1 was filed in 1991, when everybody knew that it was impossible to sue tobacco companies successfully. It was a class action, brought under a Florida court rule modelled on a federal rule that had generally been understood to bar class actions for "mass torts". This particular class action, against all the major cigarette companies, sought damages for illnesses suffered by flight attendants as a . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M L Flores, J Barnoya, R Mejia, E Alderete, and E J Perez-Stable
Litigation in Argentina: challenging the tobacco industry.
Tob. Control, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 90 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
J B Richmond, D M Burns, and K M Cummings
Public health and the power of individual action
Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(90001): i1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
E L Sweda Jr
Lawsuits and secondhand smoke
Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(90001): i61 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.