Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gray, N J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gray, N J.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:143-144
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


Debate

SMOKER-FREE POLICIES

SMOKER-FREE POLICIES

The case for smoker-free workplaces

N John Gray

Correspondence to:
Nigel John Gray
International Agency for Research Against Cancer, 150 Cours Abert Thomas, Lyon 69008, France; nigel@uicc.org

Keywords: smoke-free workplaces

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The recent experience of making bars in New York and Ireland smoke-free seems likely to give further impetus to the push for smoke-free workplaces and public places. The primary stimulus for the smoke-free workplace has always been employee occupational health, but an important secondary benefit is the consistently reported significant effect of reduced smoking frequency and increased quit rates among employees in smoke-free workplaces.1,2

I have always thought the ultimate objective is a workplace which is both smoke-free and smoker-free. The practicality of this objective depends on a number of variables, especially smoking prevalence rates and applicable laws in the country concerned. While it may not be practical across the community, it seems appropriate for exemplar organisations such as hospitals, cancer charities and cancer institutes to explicitly aim for both smoke- and smoker-free workplaces.


BECOMING SMOKER-FREE
In the late 1980s, the Anti-cancer Council of Victoria (Australia) went both smoke-free and . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S Chapman and B Freeman
Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry.
Tob. Control, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.