|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EDITORIAL |
| Passive smoking |
Correspondence to:
Professor Konrad Jamrozik
School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; k.jamrozik@sph.uq.edu.au
Keywords: passive smoking
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
It is over 30 years since the appearance of the first English language reports indicating that passive smoking is harmful to the respiratory health of infants and children,1,2 and almost a quarter of a century has elapsed since publication of the first two papers pointing to an increased risk of lung cancer in non-smoking adults who live with smokers.3,4 The first of these events passed without much discussion but, by the time the second occurred, the tobacco companies were ready with a strategy to oppose what they had been advised was "the most dangerous development yet to the viability of the tobacco industry that has yet occurred".5 That strategy went beyond disputing the science to "playing the man"; Hirayamas credentials as a scientist were called into question. Fully nine years later, he was spirited away from the 7th World Conference on Tobacco and Health in Perth, Western Australia,
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Cherrie, M. Van Tongeren, and S. Semple Exposure to Occupational Carcinogens in Great Britain Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2007; 51(8): 653 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |