Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2005;14:294-295; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.014092
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jamrozik, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jamrozik, K
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking
Right arrow Health effects of tobacco use
Right arrow Environmental tobacco smoke

EDITORIAL

Passive smoking

Slaying myths about passive smoking

K Jamrozik

Correspondence to:
Professor Konrad Jamrozik
School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; k.jamrozik@sph.uq.edu.au


The tobacco industry continues to promulgate myths about passive smoking

Keywords: passive smoking

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

It is over 30 years since the appearance of the first English language reports indicating that passive smoking is harmful to the respiratory health of infants and children,1,2 and almost a quarter of a century has elapsed since publication of the first two papers pointing to an increased risk of lung cancer in non-smoking adults who live with smokers.3,4 The first of these events passed without much discussion but, by the time the second occurred, the tobacco companies were ready with a strategy to oppose what they had been advised was "the most dangerous development yet to the viability of the tobacco industry that has yet occurred".5 That strategy went beyond disputing the science to "playing the man"; Hirayama’s credentials as a scientist were called into question. Fully nine years later, he was spirited away from the 7th World Conference on Tobacco and Health in Perth, Western Australia, . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. W. Cherrie, M. Van Tongeren, and S. Semple
Exposure to Occupational Carcinogens in Great Britain
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2007; 51(8): 653 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.