Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2005;14:359-360; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.012989
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Delaimy, W K
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Delaimy, W K
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, J P
Related Collections
Right arrow Smoking cessation

LETTER

When California smokers use nicotine replacement therapy, most are trying to quit smoking

W K Al-Delaimy, E A Gilpin, J P Pierce

Cancer Prevention and Control, University of California, San Diego, Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA

Correspondence to:
W K Al-Delaimy
waldelaimy@ucsd.edu

Keywords: California; cessation; nicotine replacement therapy

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Extensive literature exists about nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) efficacy in randomised clinical trials of smoking cessation,1 yet population data do not show sustained effectiveness after NRT became available over the counter in the USA.2,3 Some claim that product cost is the main obstacle for its lack of population effectiveness.4 A large population based natural experiment is underway in New York that will test this hypothesis. Others suggest that smokers may be using NRT for reasons other than quitting, such as harm reduction or to mitigate withdrawal symptoms when they are unable to smoke.5

We present data from the 2002 California Tobacco Survey (CTS) which is part of large population based, random digit dialled surveys conducted triennially to monitor changes in tobacco use and attitudes in California. The methods for this survey are described in detail elsewhere.6 In order to assess the purpose and pattern of NRT use among California smokers, . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
D. E Levy, A. N Thorndike, L. Biener, and N. A Rigotti
Use of nicotine replacement therapy to reduce or delay smoking but not to quit: prevalence and association with subsequent cessation efforts
Tob. Control, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 384 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Is NRT loosing its efficacy?
John R Hughes
Tobacco Control Online, 2 Nov 2005 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.