Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Tobacco Control 2005;14:361-362; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.014449
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

EDITORIAL

Researching tobacco documents

Beyond quagmires: the evolving quality of documents research

E D Balbach1, E M Barbeau2

1 Community Health Program, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA
2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Edith D Balbach
Community Health Program, Tufts University, 112 Packard Avenue, Medford, Massachusetts, USA; edith.balbach@tufts.edu


A decade of tobacco document research has been completed

Keywords: tobacco document research

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

With 10 years of tobacco documents research (TDR) completed, now is a reasonable time for those of us who conduct TDR to assess its legacy and its potential. In this issue of Tobacco Control, Stacy Carter thoughtfully depicts historical patterns in the conduct and reporting of TDR and how these patterns have evolved.1 She proposes "a process for planning and evaluating TDR that positions the researcher as constructor" rather than merely as a conduit of information contained in the documents, and encourages researchers to be more conscious of the analytic traditions they bring to their searching and analysis strategies. From this platform, we explore the following: What has been the added value of documents research? How can this added value be sustained? And, by what standards should future work be assessed?

WHAT HAS BEEN THE ADDED VALUE OF DOCUMENTS RESEARCH?

TDR has helped us to better understand tobacco industry political and marketing strategies and research . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kreslake, J. M., Wayne, G. F., Alpert, H. R., Koh, H. K., Connolly, G. N. (2008). Tobacco Industry Control of Menthol in Cigarettes and Targeting of Adolescents and Young Adults. AJPH 98: 1685-1692 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Derry, R., Waikar, S. V. (2008). Frames and Filters: Strategic Distrust as a Legitimation Tool in the 50-Year Battle Between Public Health Activists and Big Tobacco. Business Society 47: 102-139 [Abstract]  
  • Smith, E. A. (2007). 'It's interesting how few people die from smoking': Tobacco industry efforts to minimize risk and discredit health promotion. Eur J Public Health 17: 162-170 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Anderson, S J, Dewhirst, T, Ling, P M (2006). Every document and picture tells a story: using internal corporate document reviews, semiotics, and content analysis to assess tobacco advertising. Tobacco Control 15: 254-261 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.