Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2006;15:34; doi:10.1136/tc.2005.014084
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darling, H
Right arrow Articles by Reeder, A I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Darling, H
Right arrow Articles by Reeder, A I

AD WATCH

Tobacco advertising on mini-motors

H Darling, A I Reeder

helen.darling@stonebow.otago.ac.nz

Keywords: advertising; mini-bikes

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Comprehensive smoke-free legislation has been in place in New Zealand for over 15 years and for much of that time advertising of tobacco products or the use of tobacco trademarks on goods other than tobacco products has been banned. Despite this legislation, retail products occasionally appear that clearly breach the legislation. The most recent example of such products was found in Dunedin in 2005. In this example, mini-bikes (also referred to as pocket bikes) displayed branding for Lucky Strike and Camel cigarettes. Although it is not clear if British American Tobacco or RJ Reynolds were aware of the use of their product trademark, the trademarks closely resembled those used by the manufacturers. These motorised bikes were manufactured in China and appear to appeal to young males aged 12–13 years and older. The bikes were withdrawn from sale when the retailer was notified of the violation of legislation.

Even in a . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
C. A. Jimenez-Ruiz, J. A. R. Miranda, R. D. Hurt, A. R. Pinedo, S. S. Reina, and F. C. Valero
Study of impact of laws regulating tobacco consumption on the prevalence of passive smoking in Spain
Eur J Public Health, August 2, 2008; (2008) ckn066v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
N. K. Gotz, M. van Tongeren, H. Wareing, L. M. Wallace, S. Semple, and L. MacCalman
Changes in air quality and second-hand smoke exposure in hospitality sector businesses after introduction of the English Smoke-free legislation
J. Public Health Med., July 23, 2008; (2008) fdn062v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
G. E. Matt, J. T. Bernert, and M. F. Hovell
Measuring Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Children: An Ecological Measurement Approach
J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2008; 33(2): 156 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.