Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2007;16:294-295
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gombojav, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gombojav, T.

News analysis

Mongolia: proportion of tobacco tax for health

Nick Wilson1, Tsetsegdary Gombojav2

1 Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand
2 Ministry of Health, Mongolia; nwilson@actrix.gen.nz

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In March 2007, Mongolia started to divert a proportion of its tobacco tax revenue towards a new health promotion foundation. This followed a tobacco control law that required that the foundation be established "to enhance healthy lifestyles and reduce tobacco consumption among the population."

In the debate leading up to the new law, it was reported that "some of the lawmakers insisted that the excise tax on tobacco should be accumulated in a national fund to fight hazards of tobacco and be used for anti-smoking advertising campaigns."

While the amount of funds for the new foundation are modest—2% of the tobacco tax revenue, or around US$180 000 per year—it represents a fairly rare move for a developing country. Only a few other such countries dedicate any of their tobacco tax revenue to health related purposes—Estonia, Poland, Egypt, Thailand, Korea, Taiwan and Qatar. All these have higher per capita incomes than . . . [Full text of this article]




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Correction to spelling of coauthor's name
Nick Wilson, et al.
Tobacco Control Online, 21 Dec 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.