Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2007;16:357-358; doi:10.1136/tc.2006.019398
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maher, J. E
Right arrow Articles by Yepassis-Zembrou, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maher, J. E
Right arrow Articles by Yepassis-Zembrou, P.

LETTER

Does free nicotine replacement therapy for young adults prompt them to call a quitline?

Julie E Maher1, Kristen Rohde1, Barbara Pizacani1, Clyde Dent1, Michael J Stark1, Julia A Dilley1, Kathryn E Pickle1, Michael J Boysun2, Juliet R Thompson2, Patricia Yepassis-Zembrou3

1 Program Design and Evaluation Services, Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Department of Human Services, Portland, OR, USA
2 Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, WA, USA
3 Free and Clear, Inc, Seattle, WA, USA

Correspondence to:
Julie Maher
PhD, 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 550, Portland, OR 97232, USA; julie.e.maher@state.or.us

Accepted 4 May 2007

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A recent paper by An et al found that offering free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) through Minnesota’s state tobacco quitline (QL) was associated with large increases in calls and quit rates.1 Other state programmes might not be able to afford NRT for all QL callers, and instead could target specific at-risk populations. Washington State’s tobacco QL had a free NRT service enhancement targeted at young adults—a population whose smoking prevalence has recently increased in the United States.2 In this letter, we describe Washington’s QL service enhancement for young adults, and the associated changes in call volume and quit rates.

From January 2005 through January 2006, the Washington QL offered a five-call proactive counselling service that included free NRT for 8 weeks (that is, "Washington Benefit") to all 18–29-year-olds willing to set a quit date within the next month or needing help staying quit. This enhancement was funded, in part, by . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.