|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
SPECIAL COMMUNICATION |
1 UCSD School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA
2 Division of Environmental Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
3 Cancer Council of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
4 University of Minnesota Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
5 Department of Environmental and Occupational Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
6 Roswell Park Research Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
7 Tobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
8 Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
9 International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
10 Royal Free and University College London Medical School, London, UK
11 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), The Netherlands
Correspondence to:
D Burns, 1120 Solana Drive, Del Mar, California 92014, USA; dburns@ucsd.edu
Received 6 November 2007
Accepted 19 December 2007
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Preventing initiation of tobacco product use, promoting cessation of tobacco use, and protecting the public from exposure to second hand smoke are recognised by the World Health organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and by the WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg) as the most effective approaches to reducing tobacco related morbidity and mortality. However, the FCTC also recognises the need for tobacco product regulation in articles 9 and 10 of the treaty. In order to inform that process TobReg has developed a series of reports that begin to provide a scientific foundation for tobacco product regulation.1–6 This paper summarises a proposal, and the considerations that led to it, developed by a joint International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and WHO working group, and approved by TobReg, which presents performance standards for cigarettes and a strategy to use them to mandate a reduction in the
Relevant Article
Tob. Control 2008 17: 73-74.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Liberman and M. Heyward Use of the precautionary principle in the debate about emissions limits: a cautionary note Tob. Control, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 286 - 287. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gray A letter from Nigel Gray Tob. Control, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 287 - 288. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chapman Benefits and risks in ending regulatory exceptionalism for tobacco Tob. Control, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 73 - 74. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |