Tobacco Control

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Tobacco Control 2008;17:145-146; doi:10.1136/tc.2008.025791
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, M.
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wakefield, M.
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, J.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

Back to the future: tobacco industry interference, evidence and the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Melanie Wakefield1, Jonathan Liberman2

1 Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
2 VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control and the Framework Convention Alliance for Tobacco Control, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to:
Melanie Wakefield, Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia; melanie.wakefield@cancervic.org.au

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The publication of a special communication by Ronald Davis in this issue (see page 211)1 about a report on the effect of tobacco advertising bans ("the Boddewyn report") that was in fact ghost-written by British American Tobacco caused one of us to experience a memory flashback to the mid-1980s. At that time, MW was working as a research officer in a state health department in Adelaide, South Australia. I (MW) distinctly remember being given the Boddewyn report to provide comment on to my health minister’s office. Even though I was then an inexperienced researcher, I could see that the report was seriously flawed. Because it was apparently the work of such a prestigious-sounding individual and organisation, I became deeply concerned that it could actually influence government policy. I prepared several pages of critique pointing out the problems with the report, added a concise summary, and sent it back up . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

British American Tobacco ghost-wrote reports on tobacco advertising bans by the International Advertising Association and J J Boddewyn
R M Davis
Tob. Control 2008 17: 211-214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.