PERSPECTIVES
Commentaries
Tobacco prohibition: doing the unthinkable
Correspondence to:
Dr Stan Shatenstein, GLOBALink News and Information Monitoring Initiative, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3W 3A8; shatensteins@sympatico.ca
Received 13 November 2008
Accepted 13 November 2008
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A decade ago, I challenged an American Medical Association/British Medical Association proposal to gradually eliminate nicotine in cigarettes (Tob Control 1999;8:106–9). Similar concerns force me to disagree with Richard Daynards call for a ban on cigarettes themselves.
A cigarette-free world is "a consummation devoutly to be wished", but Daynard severely underplays the smuggling angle and minimises cigarettes unmatched appeal as nicotine delivery devices. Forcing large numbers of unwilling smokers to quit is a political and social non-starter.
The United States has failed to ratify the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and mandates pathetic warnings. A total ban is a huge stretch, but I believe Peter Hanauer errs in arguing we cant tell people what to do—thats why we legislate. Cigarettes warrant a ban, but Hanauers right on the measures impracticability.
I stated in 1999 that cigarettes need the kind of "green glow" that would make even
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
